* Bogus interrupt -1
@ 2001-04-20 16:32 Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-20 17:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lars Brinkhoff @ 2001-04-20 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
I got these messages from benh's 2.4.4-pre1 running SMP:
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c000781c
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0017ba4
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0024c90
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0017ba4
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0017c34
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0017ba4
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c0006e38
According to my System.map:
c0006e38 = _nmask_and_or_msr + 0x10
c000781c = _switch_to + 0x184
c0017ba4 = schedule + 0x1084
c0017c34 = schedule + 0x1228
c0024c90 = del_timer_sync + 0x184
At first, the first six or so messages appeared, but everything seemed
fine. Later, the last messages appeared, and it seemed like one of
the two processors in my 2001 Dual G4 had wedged. According to "top",
there was always at least 50% idle time.
--
http://lars.nocrew.org/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
2001-04-20 16:32 Bogus interrupt -1 Lars Brinkhoff
@ 2001-04-20 17:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-23 9:52 ` Lars Brinkhoff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2001-04-20 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Brinkhoff, linuxppc-dev
>At first, the first six or so messages appeared, but everything seemed
>fine. Later, the last messages appeared, and it seemed like one of
>the two processors in my 2001 Dual G4 had wedged. According to "top",
>there was always at least 50% idle time.
Did you enable distribution of IRQs to all CPUs ?
I don't think it's completely safe yet.
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
2001-04-20 17:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2001-04-23 9:52 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-23 12:18 ` Tony Mantler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lars Brinkhoff @ 2001-04-23 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> >At first, the first six or so messages appeared, but everything seemed
> >fine. Later, the last messages appeared, and it seemed like one of
> >the two processors in my 2001 Dual G4 had wedged. According to "top",
> >there was always at least 50% idle time.
> Did you enable distribution of IRQs to all CPUs ?
> I don't think it's completely safe yet.
Yes, IRQ distribution was enabled. I disabled it, and now the
messages don't appear any more. However, it still seems like one CPU
hangs after some time.
--
http://lars.nocrew.org/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
2001-04-23 9:52 ` Lars Brinkhoff
@ 2001-04-23 12:18 ` Tony Mantler
2001-04-23 12:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-05-12 18:18 ` Success? Both CPUs running (Was: Bogus interrupt -1) Lars Brinkhoff
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tony Mantler @ 2001-04-23 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Brinkhoff, Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
At 4:52 AM -0500 4/23/2001, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>> >At first, the first six or so messages appeared, but everything seemed
>> >fine. Later, the last messages appeared, and it seemed like one of
>> >the two processors in my 2001 Dual G4 had wedged. According to "top",
>> >there was always at least 50% idle time.
>> Did you enable distribution of IRQs to all CPUs ?
>> I don't think it's completely safe yet.
>
>Yes, IRQ distribution was enabled. I disabled it, and now the
>messages don't appear any more. However, it still seems like one CPU
>hangs after some time.
A friend of mine is having trouble with one CPU hanging in his dual G4
under MacOS X. You may want to check to make sure you don't have a hardware
problem.
The symptoms are pretty much (from what he's told me): The system runs for
a while, then one of the CPUs goes off into la-la land never to return
again. Not very complicated.
Cheers - Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler :)
--
Tony "Nicoya" Mantler - Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire - nicoya@apia.dhs.org
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada -- http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
2001-04-23 12:18 ` Tony Mantler
@ 2001-04-23 12:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-23 12:47 ` Tony Mantler
2001-05-12 18:18 ` Success? Both CPUs running (Was: Bogus interrupt -1) Lars Brinkhoff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lars Brinkhoff @ 2001-04-23 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Mantler; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linuxppc-dev
Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org> writes:
> At 4:52 AM -0500 4/23/2001, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > However, it still seems like one CPU hangs after some time.
>
> A friend of mine is having trouble with one CPU hanging in his dual
> G4 under MacOS X. The symptoms are pretty much (from what he's told
> me): The system runs for a while, then one of the CPUs goes off into
> la-la land never to return again.
The same thing happens to me, as far as I can tell. Usually after a
few hours of operation.
> You may want to check to make sure you don't have a hardware
> problem.
Any idea how? I ran the "Apple Hardware Test" CD without any failure
indications.
--
http://lars.nocrew.org/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
2001-04-23 12:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
@ 2001-04-23 12:47 ` Tony Mantler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tony Mantler @ 2001-04-23 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Brinkhoff; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linuxppc-dev
At 7:24 AM -0500 4/23/2001, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org> writes:
>> At 4:52 AM -0500 4/23/2001, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>> > However, it still seems like one CPU hangs after some time.
>>
>> A friend of mine is having trouble with one CPU hanging in his dual
>> G4 under MacOS X. The symptoms are pretty much (from what he's told
>> me): The system runs for a while, then one of the CPUs goes off into
>> la-la land never to return again.
>
>The same thing happens to me, as far as I can tell. Usually after a
>few hours of operation.
>
>> You may want to check to make sure you don't have a hardware
>> problem.
>
>Any idea how? I ran the "Apple Hardware Test" CD without any failure
>indications.
Other than "Run OS X (Or maybe Darwin) for a while and see if the same
thing happens", I don't know.
Cheers - Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler :)
--
Tony "Nicoya" Mantler - Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire - nicoya@apia.dhs.org
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada -- http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Success? Both CPUs running (Was: Bogus interrupt -1)
2001-04-23 12:18 ` Tony Mantler
2001-04-23 12:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
@ 2001-05-12 18:18 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-05-12 18:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Lars Brinkhoff @ 2001-05-12 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Mantler; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linuxppc-dev
Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org> writes:
> At 4:52 AM -0500 4/23/2001, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > However, it still seems like one CPU hangs after some time.
>
> A friend of mine is having trouble with one CPU hanging in his dual G4
> under MacOS X. You may want to check to make sure you don't have a hardware
> problem.
>
> The symptoms are pretty much (from what he's told me): The system runs for
> a while, then one of the CPUs goes off into la-la land never to return
> again. Not very complicated.
It seems to me there was a bug in benh 2.4.4-pre1. I'm now running bk
2.4.5-pre1, and I have never seen a CPU hang.
--
http://lars.nocrew.org/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bogus interrupt -1
@ 2001-01-20 10:17 Jiri Masik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Masik @ 2001-01-20 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Michel Dänzer <michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch> writes:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > >I have tons of messages like this in my logs:
> > >
> > >Jan 18 23:06:54 pismo kernel: Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c00065d0
> > >
> > >Anyone knows where these (may) come from?
> >
> > Which kernel ?
>
> Paulus' 2.4.0 from the 11th.
I had Paulus' 2.4.0 from the 9th with the same behaviour. It also
occurs with 2.4.0-test13-pre3 and 2.4.1-pre7, 2.4.1-pre8 from bk.
Jiri
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Bogus interrupt -1
@ 2001-01-18 23:01 Michel Dänzer
2001-01-19 9:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2001-01-18 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
I have tons of messages like this in my logs:
Jan 18 23:06:54 pismo kernel: Bogus interrupt -1 from PC = c00065d0
Anyone knows where these (may) come from?
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-12 18:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-20 16:32 Bogus interrupt -1 Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-20 17:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-23 9:52 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-23 12:18 ` Tony Mantler
2001-04-23 12:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-04-23 12:47 ` Tony Mantler
2001-05-12 18:18 ` Success? Both CPUs running (Was: Bogus interrupt -1) Lars Brinkhoff
2001-05-12 18:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-20 10:17 Bogus interrupt -1 Jiri Masik
2001-01-18 23:01 Michel Dänzer
2001-01-19 9:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-01-20 2:23 ` Michel Dänzer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).