From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Michael Larabel <michael@michaellarabel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 3/5] kvm/arm64: add kvm_arch_test_clear_young()
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:00:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86lekwy8d7.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOUHufYSx-edDVCZSauOzwOJG6Av0++0TFT4ko8qWq7vLi_mjw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:21:28 +0000,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:12 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds kvm_arch_test_clear_young() for the vast majority of
> > VMs that are not pKVM and run on hardware that sets the accessed bit
> > in KVM page tables.
I'm really interested in how you can back this statement. 90% of the
HW I have access to is not FEAT_HWAFDB capable, either because it
predates the feature or because the feature is too buggy to be useful.
Do you have numbers?
> >
> > It relies on two techniques, RCU and cmpxchg, to safely test and clear
> > the accessed bit without taking the MMU lock. The former protects KVM
> > page tables from being freed while the latter clears the accessed bit
> > atomically against both the hardware and other software page table
> > walkers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 8 +++
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/stage2_pgtable.h | 43 ++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 51 ++--------------
> > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 6 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> Adding Marc and Will.
>
> Can you please add other interested parties that I've missed?
The MAINTAINERS file has it all:
KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)
M: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
R: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
R: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
R: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
L: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
May I suggest that you repost your patch and Cc the interested
parties yourself? I guess most folks will want to see this in context,
and not as a random, isolated change with no rationale.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 4:12 [PATCH mm-unstable v1 0/5] mm/kvm: lockless accessed bit harvest Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:12 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/5] mm/kvm: add mmu_notifier_test_clear_young() Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 17:40 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 17:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-17 4:12 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 2/5] kvm/x86: add kvm_arch_test_clear_young() Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:19 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 16:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 5:58 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 17:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 17:27 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 18:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 18:34 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 18:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 19:02 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 19:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 19:25 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:12 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 3/5] kvm/arm64: " Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:21 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 9:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-02-23 3:58 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-23 9:18 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 9:09 ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-17 16:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 5:25 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 4:43 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:12 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 4/5] kvm/powerpc: " Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:24 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-17 4:12 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 5/5] mm: multi-gen LRU: use mmu_notifier_test_clear_young() Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 18:08 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 19:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 19:36 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 19:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 20:09 ` Yu Zhao
2023-02-23 20:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 20:48 ` Yu Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86lekwy8d7.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@michaellarabel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).