From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:34:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rjb5vv4.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b07bac7a882c69deb9e6c8f234a68b3022f29072.1596734105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> search_exception_tables() is an heavy operation, we have to avoid it.
> When KUAP is selected, we'll know the fault has been blocked by KUAP.
> Otherwise, it behaves just as if the address was already in the TLBs
> and no fault was generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 20 +++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index 525e0c2b5406..edde169ba3a6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -214,24 +214,14 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
> if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
> return true;
>
> - if (!is_exec && (error_code & DSISR_PROTFAULT) &&
> - !search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) {
> + // Read/write fault blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed.
> + if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) {
> pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to access user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n",
> - address,
> - from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()));
> - }
> -
> - // Fault on user outside of certain regions (eg. copy_tofrom_user()) is bad
> - if (!search_exception_tables(regs->nip))
> - return true;
We still need to keep this ? Without that we detect the lack of
exception tables pretty late.
> -
> - // Read/write fault in a valid region (the exception table search passed
> - // above), but blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed.
> - if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write))
> + address, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()));
> return true;
> + }
>
> - // What's left? Kernel fault on user in well defined regions (extable
> - // matched), and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context.
> + // What's left? Kernel fault on user and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context.
> return false;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-06 17:15 [PATCH v1 1/5] powerpc/mm: sanity_check_fault() should work for all, not only BOOK3S Christophe Leroy
2020-08-06 17:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] powerpc/fault: Unnest definition of page_fault_is_write() and page_fault_is_bad() Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 8:44 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-06 17:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] powerpc/fault: Reorder tests in bad_kernel_fault() Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 8:46 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-06 17:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 8:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-09 6:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-09-09 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-14 2:23 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-06 17:15 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] powerpc/fault: Perform exception fixup in do_page_fault() Christophe Leroy
2020-08-06 21:07 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-08 9:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-08 8:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] powerpc/mm: sanity_check_fault() should work for all, not only BOOK3S Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-08 8:56 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rjb5vv4.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).