From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: anton@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, alistair@popple.id.au,
arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "powerpc/powernv: Increase memory block size to 1GB on radix"
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:50:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sexrms8.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180430195356.0f44123b@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:34:32 +1000
> Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This reverts commit 53ecde0b9126ff140abe3aefd7f0ec64d6fa36b0.
>>
>> The commit above changed the memblock size to 1GiB, which did some
>> nice things like create fewer TLB entries for mapping memory at
>> the time of hotplug. The downside is that it changes the granularity
>> at which memory can be hot-plugged and hot-unplugged. The implication
>> is that if we had less than a 1GiB to hot-plug/hot-unplug that
>> would not be possible.
>>
>> The reason we had this fix was to resolve an issue where we did not
>> split mappings on hot-unplug, leaving a TLB entry that spanned the
>> region that was unplugged. This is now fixed by 4dd5f8a99e79 which
>> splits the page table, removing the MMU mappings for the hot-unplugged
>> region correctly.
>>
>> This trade-offs performance as we increase the number of TLB's to
>> map 1GiB of memory, mapped in via hot-plug, but gives us the ability
>> to handle smaller memory sizes.
>
> Why does powernv have any memory block size override at all now?
I dunno, history says:
powerpc/powernv: Set memory_block_size_bytes to 256MB
powerpc sets a low SECTION_SIZE_BITS to accomodate small pseries
boxes. We default to 16MB memory blocks, and boxes with a lot
of memory end up with enormous numbers of sysfs memory nodes.
Set a more reasonable default for powernv of 256MB.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
It might make more sense to go back to a single definition for powerpc
and have it return a sensible size based on the total available memory -
though I guess memory hotplugged after boot might make that difficult.
Because we definitely have pseries machines with a lot of memory these
days too.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-30 8:34 [PATCH] Revert "powerpc/powernv: Increase memory block size to 1GB on radix" Balbir Singh
2018-04-30 9:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-04-30 10:50 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-04-30 10:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-04-30 11:56 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sexrms8.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox