From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Dan Malek Cc: Tom Rini , Stefan Roese , Linuxppc-Embedded , Linuxppc-Commit Subject: Re: CPCI-405 port (PPC405GP) References: <20010918115722.A5967@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010919071751.B8132@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <3BA8DF9E.FD235CF6@mvista.com> <20010919155742.D8132@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <3BA9241B.4322817A@mvista.com> <20010919163101.E8132@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <3BA96CA2.20EC30C8@mvista.com> From: Josh Huber Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:59:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3BA96CA2.20EC30C8@mvista.com> (Dan Malek's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:12:18 -0400") Message-ID: <871yl1zz4j.fsf@mclinux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Dan Malek writes: > No, let's not. All of this stuff is on the way out. We should be > making modifications so the embedded boards support bi_recs.... All > you are doing is inventing a new way to do the same thing that has > always worked. Yes, you are _way_ over engineering. I'm seriously considering adding this support to ppcboot soon. I should discuss this on the ppcboot list fisrt, to make sure no one else is working on it first though. I definately agree that bi_recs is the way to go... -- Josh Huber ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/