From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vmcore: allow fadump to export vmcore even if is_kdump_kernel() is false
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:13:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734zltc6z.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230905183604.568996-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Currently, is_kdump_kernel() returns true when elfcorehdr_addr is set.
> While elfcorehdr_addr is set for kexec based kernel dump mechanism,
> alternate dump capturing methods like fadump [1] also set it to export
> the vmcore. Since, is_kdump_kernel() is used to restrict resources in
> crash dump capture kernel and such restrictions are not desirable for
> fadump, allow is_kdump_kernel() to be defined differently for fadump
> case. With that change, include is_fadump_active() check in functions
> is_vmcore_usable() & vmcore_unusable() to be able to export vmcore for
> fadump case too.
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_dump.h b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> index 0f3a656293b0..de8a9fabfb6f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> +++ b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void vmcore_cleanup(void);
> #define vmcore_elf64_check_arch(x) (elf_check_arch(x) || vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross(x))
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef is_kdump_kernel
> /*
> * is_kdump_kernel() checks whether this kernel is booting after a panic of
> * previous kernel or not. This is determined by checking if previous kernel
> @@ -64,6 +65,19 @@ static inline bool is_kdump_kernel(void)
> {
> return elfcorehdr_addr != ELFCORE_ADDR_MAX;
> }
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef is_fadump_active
> +/*
> + * If f/w assisted dump capturing mechanism (fadump), instead of kexec based
> + * dump capturing mechanism (kdump) is exporting the vmcore, then this function
> + * will be defined in arch specific code to return true, when appropriate.
> + */
> +static inline bool is_fadump_active(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> /* is_vmcore_usable() checks if the kernel is booting after a panic and
> * the vmcore region is usable.
> @@ -75,7 +89,8 @@ static inline bool is_kdump_kernel(void)
>
> static inline int is_vmcore_usable(void)
> {
> - return is_kdump_kernel() && elfcorehdr_addr != ELFCORE_ADDR_ERR ? 1 : 0;
> + return (is_kdump_kernel() || is_fadump_active())
> + && elfcorehdr_addr != ELFCORE_ADDR_ERR ? 1 : 0;
> }
>
> /* vmcore_unusable() marks the vmcore as unusable,
> @@ -84,7 +99,7 @@ static inline int is_vmcore_usable(void)
>
> static inline void vmcore_unusable(void)
> {
> - if (is_kdump_kernel())
> + if (is_kdump_kernel() || is_fadump_active())
> elfcorehdr_addr = ELFCORE_ADDR_ERR;
> }
I think it would be cleaner to decouple is_vmcore_usable() and
vmcore_usable() from is_kdump_kernel().
ie, make them operate solely based on the value of elforehdr_addr:
static inline int is_vmcore_usable(void)
{
elfcorehdr_addr != ELFCORE_ADDR_ERR && \
elfcorehdr_addr != ELFCORE_ADDR_MAX;
}
static inline void vmcore_unusable(void)
{
elfcorehdr_addr = ELFCORE_ADDR_ERR;
}
Then all we need on powerpc is a way to override is_kdump_kernel().
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-05 18:36 [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/fadump: make is_fadump_active() visible for exporting vmcore Hari Bathini
2023-09-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vmcore: allow fadump to export vmcore even if is_kdump_kernel() is false Hari Bathini
2023-09-11 7:13 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-09-11 10:31 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-12 8:31 ` Hari Bathini
2023-09-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/fadump: make is_kdump_kernel() return false when fadump is active Hari Bathini
2023-09-07 5:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/fadump: make is_fadump_active() visible for exporting vmcore Baoquan He
2023-09-08 5:49 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734zltc6z.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).