From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842C5C433FE for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 08:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NCXx428mSz3dyW for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:23:20 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2020 header.b=pRs5JR7b; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=2020e header.b=VPYEAu0O; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de (client-ip=193.142.43.55; helo=galois.linutronix.de; envelope-from=tglx@linutronix.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2020 header.b=pRs5JR7b; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=2020e header.b=VPYEAu0O; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NCXw04mnYz3cKn for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:22:24 +1100 (AEDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1668673338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wIVX2MwJcu88wyoRSA1ASXFeHTanLRpod2fOiAYk42Q=; b=pRs5JR7b+MK5IrHfaCpInQxaDeC9PvLo7Zo1msTJyoCGPbL+6O8u4CqY3P5lAAqWNgdDeS Wor/o6pp3iVymD4p2gJG/HMX74WixBFfLFutuf+HsdWohrU85CZzDkvVKrovF6T+T3m+AW BDyNHqKpKeCG8Pa2zdgXoqAMhZ4x3ntI+1l75eBvNGQy5jeEGTbkgKSYJuB9Xa+hDLyRPo CP3cEuwwh7lHoufv9Otj/O10K7OhQ0HLfG06MINUxbYTEwlTMqaY9g/V9xuSqs+FZfpGMk JRzV6t/Z3sPM+330lwYCsVQBePNWNqlFlrM6HYoHwLO+biS1QiI67/gbnW8E4Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1668673338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wIVX2MwJcu88wyoRSA1ASXFeHTanLRpod2fOiAYk42Q=; b=VPYEAu0OHciMT2/0zjp9NwK3Ej0xV3gqu1ZiXKKa3Bl2hm2hGGSIINgmAIItBguwG+ofeA EnxX6Q1iJQJvdiDQ== To: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [patch 34/39] PCI/MSI: Reject multi-MSI early In-Reply-To: <20221116163118.GA1116261@bhelgaas> References: <20221116163118.GA1116261@bhelgaas> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:22:18 +0100 Message-ID: <8735aing79.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Dave Jiang , Ashok Raj , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Allen Hubbe , Kevin Tian , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Jon Mason , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alex Williamson , Bjorn Helgaas , Dan Williams , Reinette Chatre , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Marc Zyngier , Logan Gunthorpe Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Nov 16 2022 at 10:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> +/** >> + * pci_msi_domain_supports - Check for support of a particular feature flag >> + * @pdev: The PCI device to operate on >> + * @feature_mask: The feature mask to check for (full match) >> + * @mode: If ALLOW_LEGACY this grants the feature when there is no irq domain >> + * associated to the device. If DENY_LEGACY the lack of an irq domain >> + * makes the feature unsupported > > Looks like some of these might be wider than 80 columns, which I think > was the typical width of this file. I accommodated to the general sentiment that 80 columns is yesterday. My new cutoff is 100. Thanks, tglx