From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46F7C433DB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D0364DD6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:52:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 31D0364DD6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DRXjg6SVDzDrdj for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 07:52:55 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bauerman@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=s/l0pmVJ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DRXgk4TChzDrfR for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 07:51:13 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SKVcpg023361; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=references : from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=pp1; bh=pPg1XBrZNOKt8PfRp2cpKYCHVhYVgYATSuz8a5k9sWs=; b=s/l0pmVJBeGfhLJGM9iTfiQoVbA/zJnyD9eZBqmBkrJsTkZ5ibP8rglrttvRBSJ2rWqC VegDJ4kmPIvKZ7zh+i42gtnv6ereyfJEOfXjA1EJJjouLOAxeL8Wu7sdFp2kaaV/oC5L 0bRfDr0n3n6Ce2PtVwfT7K8X7ahWKVjb6rU9xh3OCwKu/sY1jcDdwAJ+9fN+/0tzmwHg Z/6Q+Y7JCWhJH/daaz4NJ9GkJKNHemPLI+uWgo7PHEcyV1c/FWoPCS9UyXuO9L6ncyb+ xKhbBiZEJMePet4Al5qjHZoPW8BVl9ivby8bodas04NDxBMjvtRoM60rMYHWOP8Gezwq iw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36c3b6sxe8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:05 -0500 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 10SKW4IC027685; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:05 -0500 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36c3b6sxdx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SKgio5020310; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:04 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36a4mccqkt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:04 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10SKp3ln28901864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFFFAE05F; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF93EAE060; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:50:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from manicouagan.localdomain (unknown [9.85.160.249]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:50:58 +0000 (GMT) References: <20210128181421.2279-1-hch@lst.de> <20210128181421.2279-5-hch@lst.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 27.1 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module In-reply-to: <20210128181421.2279-5-hch@lst.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:50:56 -0300 Message-ID: <874kj023bj.fsf@manicouagan.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-28_12:2021-01-28, 2021-01-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101280097 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Petr Mladek , Jiri Kosina , Andrew Donnellan , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Masahiro Yamada , Josh Poimboeuf , Maarten Lankhorst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , Joe Lawrence , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Thomas Zimmermann , Jessica Yu , Frederic Barrat , Daniel Vetter , Miroslav Benes , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Christoph, Christoph Hellwig writes: > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > index 981302f616b411..6772fb2680eb3e 100644 > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct module *find_module_all(const char *name, size_t len, > > struct module *find_module(const char *name) > { > - module_assert_mutex(); Does it make sense to replace the assert above with the warn below (untested)? RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(rcu_read_lock_sched_held()); > return find_module_all(name, strlen(name), false); > } -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center