From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (e28smtp09.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp09.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2D72C00CB for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:12:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:39:03 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23888E004A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:43:51 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r3B5BsHc11796750 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:41:54 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r3B5BwY8000680 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:11:59 GMT From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 12/25] powerpc: Return all the valid pte ecndoing in KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO ioctl In-Reply-To: <20130411032447.GU8165@truffula.fritz.box> References: <1365055083-31956-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1365055083-31956-13-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130411032447.GU8165@truffula.fritz.box> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:41:57 +0530 Message-ID: <874nfdodlu.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Gibson writes: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:27:50AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" > > Surely this can't be correct until the KVM H_ENTER implementation is > updated to cope with the MPSS page sizes. Why ? We are returning info regarding penc values for different combination. I would guess qemu to only use info related to base page size. Rest it can ignore right ?. Obviously i haven't tested this part. So let me know if I should drop this ? -aneesh