From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>,
dianders@chromium.org, liusong@linux.alibaba.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, pmladek@suse.com,
kernelfans@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, npiggin@gmail.com,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Cc: yaoma@linux.alibaba.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 1/4] genirq: Provide a snapshot mechanism for interrupt statistics
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:17:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xwp480e.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3c7ef07-8fad-4ef6-9095-16e4bd734477@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Apr 10 2024 at 14:45, Bitao Hu wrote:
> On 2024/4/9 17:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> By the way, what do you think of my reason for using printk() instead of
> pr_crit()? Should I change this part of the code in v13?
Either way is fine. Just put a proper explanation into the change log if
you stick with printk().
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 12:52 [PATCHv12 0/4] *** Detect interrupt storm in softlockup *** Bitao Hu
2024-03-06 12:52 ` [PATCHv12 1/4] genirq: Provide a snapshot mechanism for interrupt statistics Bitao Hu
2024-04-09 9:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 6:45 ` Bitao Hu
2024-04-10 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-03-06 12:52 ` [PATCHv12 2/4] genirq: Avoid summation loops for /proc/interrupts Bitao Hu
2024-03-06 12:52 ` [PATCHv12 3/4] watchdog/softlockup: low-overhead detection of interrupt storm Bitao Hu
2024-03-06 12:52 ` [PATCHv12 4/4] watchdog/softlockup: report the most frequent interrupts Bitao Hu
2024-03-23 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-25 9:47 ` Bitao Hu
2024-04-01 16:41 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xwp480e.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).