From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Skip updating masks for non-online nodes
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 15:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yxu85wi.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210701041552.112072-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
> void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> - int i, j;
> + int i, j, empty;
>
> + empty = cpumask_empty(sched_domains_numa_masks[0][node]);
> for (i = 0; i < sched_domains_numa_levels; i++) {
> for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++) {
> - if (node_distance(j, node) <= sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
> + if (!node_online(j))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (node_distance(j, node) <= sched_domains_numa_distance[i]) {
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, sched_domains_numa_masks[i][j]);
> +
> + /*
> + * We skip updating numa_masks for offline
> + * nodes. However now that the node is
> + * finally online, CPUs that were added
> + * earlier, should now be accommodated into
> + * newly oneline node's numa mask.
> + */
> + if (node != j && empty) {
> + cpumask_or(sched_domains_numa_masks[i][node],
> + sched_domains_numa_masks[i][node],
> + sched_domains_numa_masks[0][j]);
> + }
> + }
Hmph, so we're playing games with masks of offline nodes - is that really
necessary? Your modification of sched_init_numa() still scans all of the
nodes (regardless of their online status) to build the distance map, and
that is never updated (sched_init_numa() is pretty much an __init
function).
So AFAICT this is all to cope with topology_span_sane() not applying
'cpu_map' to its masks. That seemed fine to me back when I wrote it, but in
light of having bogus distance values for offline nodes, not so much...
What about the below instead?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index b77ad49dc14f..c2d9caad4aa6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -2075,6 +2075,7 @@ static struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(struct sched_domain_topology_leve
static bool topology_span_sane(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
const struct cpumask *cpu_map, int cpu)
{
+ struct cpumask *intersect = sched_domains_tmpmask;
int i;
/* NUMA levels are allowed to overlap */
@@ -2090,14 +2091,17 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
if (i == cpu)
continue;
+
/*
- * We should 'and' all those masks with 'cpu_map' to exactly
- * match the topology we're about to build, but that can only
- * remove CPUs, which only lessens our ability to detect
- * overlaps
+ * We shouldn't have to bother with cpu_map here, unfortunately
+ * some architectures (powerpc says hello) have to deal with
+ * offline NUMA nodes reporting bogus distance values. This can
+ * lead to funky NODE domain spans, but since those are offline
+ * we can mask them out.
*/
+ cpumask_and(intersect, tl->mask(cpu), tl->mask(i));
if (!cpumask_equal(tl->mask(cpu), tl->mask(i)) &&
- cpumask_intersects(tl->mask(cpu), tl->mask(i)))
+ cpumask_intersects(intersect, cpu_map))
return false;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-01 4:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] Skip numa distance for offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2021-07-01 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Skip updating masks for non-online nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2021-07-01 14:28 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-07-12 12:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-07-13 16:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-23 14:39 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-04 10:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-04 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-08-08 15:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-08-09 6:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-09 12:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-08-10 11:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-16 10:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-17 0:01 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-01 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/numa: Fill distance_lookup_table for offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875yxu85wi.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).