From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, johnyoun@synopsys.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.seppala@gmail.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Gregory Herrero <gregory.herrero@intel.com>,
Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc2: fix regression on big-endian PowerPC/ARM systems
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:25:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760ujecw2.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463050104-2788693-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> A patch that went into Linux-4.4 to fix big-endian mode on a Lantiq
> MIPS system unfortunately broke big-endian operation on PowerPC
> APM82181 as reported by Christian Lamparter, and likely other
> systems.
>
> It actually introduced multiple issues:
>
> - it broke big-endian ARM kernels: any machine that was working
> correctly with a little-endian kernel is no longer using byteswaps
> on big-endian kernels, which clearly breaks them.
> - On PowerPC the same thing must be true: if it was working before,
> using big-endian kernels is now broken. Unlike ARM, 32-bit PowerPC
> usually uses big-endian kernels, so they are likely all broken.
> - The barrier for dwc2_writel is on the wrong side of the __raw_writel(),
> so the MMIO no longer synchronizes with DMA operations.
> - On architectures that require specific CPU instructions for MMIO
> access, using the __raw_ variant may turn this into a pointer
> dereference that does not have the same effect as the readl/writel.
>
> This patch is a simple revert for all architectures other than MIPS,
> in the hope that we can more easily backport it to fix the regression
> on PowerPC and ARM systems without breaking the Lantiq system again.
>
> We should follow this up with a more elaborate change to add runtime
> detection of endianess, to make sure it also works on all other
> combinations of architectures and implementations of the usb-dwc2
> device. That patch however will be fairly large and not appropriate
> for backports to stable kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 95c8bc360944 ("usb: dwc2: Use platform endianness when accessing registers")
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index 3c58d633ce80..1f8ed149a40f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -64,12 +64,24 @@
> DWC2_TRACE_SCHEDULER_VB(pr_fmt("%s: SCH: " fmt), \
> dev_name(hsotg->dev), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS
> +/*
> + * There are some MIPS machines that can run in either big-endian
> + * or little-endian mode and that use the dwc2 register without
> + * a byteswap in both ways.
> + * Unlike other architectures, MIPS does not require a barrier
> + * before the __raw_writel() to synchronize with DMA but does
> + * require the barrier after the writel() to serialize a series
> + * of writes. This set of operations was added specifically for
> + * MIPS and should only be used there.
> + */
> static inline u32 dwc2_readl(const void __iomem *addr)
> {
> u32 value = __raw_readl(addr);
>
> - /* In order to preserve endianness __raw_* operation is used. Therefore
> - * a barrier is needed to ensure IO access is not re-ordered across
> + /* in order to preserve endianness __raw_* operation is used. therefore
> + * a barrier is needed to ensure io access is not re-ordered across
> * reads or writes
> */
> mb();
> @@ -81,15 +93,32 @@ static inline void dwc2_writel(u32 value, void __iomem *addr)
> __raw_writel(value, addr);
>
> /*
> - * In order to preserve endianness __raw_* operation is used. Therefore
> - * a barrier is needed to ensure IO access is not re-ordered across
> + * in order to preserve endianness __raw_* operation is used. therefore
> + * a barrier is needed to ensure io access is not re-ordered across
> * reads or writes
> */
> mb();
> -#ifdef DWC2_LOG_WRITES
> - pr_info("INFO:: wrote %08x to %p\n", value, addr);
> +#ifdef dwc2_log_writes
> + pr_info("info:: wrote %08x to %p\n", value, addr);
> #endif
> }
> +#else
I still think this is something that should be handled at MIPS side, no ?
How many more drivers will we have to 'fix' like this ?
--
balbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 10:48 [PATCH] usb: dwc2: fix regression on big-endian PowerPC/ARM systems Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-12 11:25 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-05-12 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-12 11:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-12 11:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760ujecw2.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.seppala@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.herrero@intel.com \
--cc=johnyoun@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=yousaf.kaukab@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).