From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] PCI hotplug: rpaphp: Error out on busy status from get-sensor-state
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:39:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d7crdn7.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164684593617.368427.2230609269419942906.stgit@jupiter>
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> When certain PHB HW failure causes phyp to recover PHB, it marks the PE
> state as temporarily unavailable until recovery is complete. This also
> triggers an EEH handler in Linux which needs to notify drivers, and perform
> recovery. But before notifying the driver about the pci error it uses
> get_adapter_state()->get-sesnor-state() operation of the hotplug_slot to
> determine if the slot contains a device or not. if the slot is empty, the
> recovery is skipped entirely.
>
> However on certain PHB failures, the rtas call get-sesnor-state() returns
> extended busy error (9902) until PHB is recovered by phyp. Once PHB is
> recovered, the get-sensor-state() returns success with correct presence
> status. The rtas call interface rtas_get_sensor() loops over the rtas call
> on extended delay return code (9902) until the return value is either
> success (0) or error (-1). This causes the EEH handler to get stuck for ~6
> seconds before it could notify that the pci error has been detected and
> stop any active operations. Hence with running I/O traffic, during this 6
> seconds, the network driver continues its operation and hits a timeout
> (netdev watchdog). On timeouts, network driver go into ffdc capture mode
> and reset path assuming the PCI device is in fatal condition. This
> sometimes causes EEH recovery to fail. This impacts the ssh connection and
> leads to the system being inaccessible.
>
> ------------
> [52732.244731] DEBUG: ibm_read_slot_reset_state2()
> [52732.244762] DEBUG: ret = 0, rets[0]=5, rets[1]=1, rets[2]=4000, rets[3]=>
> [52732.244798] DEBUG: in eeh_slot_presence_check
> [52732.244804] DEBUG: error state check
> [52732.244807] DEBUG: Is slot hotpluggable
> [52732.244810] DEBUG: hotpluggable ops ?
> [52732.244953] DEBUG: Calling ops->get_adapter_status
> [52732.244958] DEBUG: calling rpaphp_get_sensor_state
> [52736.564262] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [52736.564299] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enP64p1s0f3 (tg3): transmit queue 0 timed o>
> [52736.564324] WARNING: CPU: 1442 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:478 dev>
> [...]
> [52736.564505] NIP [c000000000c32368] dev_watchdog+0x438/0x440
> [52736.564513] LR [c000000000c32364] dev_watchdog+0x434/0x440
> ------------
>
> To avoid this issue, fix the pci hotplug driver (rpaphp) to return an error
> if the slot presence state can not be detected immediately while pe is in
> EEH recovery state. Current implementation uses rtas_get_sensor() API which
> blocks the slot check state until rtas call returns success. Change
> rpaphp_get_sensor_state() to invoke rtas_call(get-sensor-state) directly
> only if the respective pe is in EEH recovery state, and take actions based
> on rtas return status.
>
> In normal cases (non-EEH case) rpaphp_get_sensor_state() will continue to
> invoke rtas_get_sensor() as it was earlier with no change in existing
> behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> Change in v5:
> - Fixup #define macros with parentheses around the values.
>
> Change in V4:
> - Error out on sensor busy only if pe is going through EEH recovery instead
> of always error out.
>
> Change in V3:
> - Invoke rtas_call(get-sensor-state) directly from
> rpaphp_get_sensor_state() directly and do special handling.
> - See v2 at
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2021-November/237336.html
>
> Change in V2:
> - Alternate approach to fix the EEH issue instead of delaying slot presence
> check proposed at
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2021-November/236956.html
>
> Also refer:
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2021-November/237027.html
Sorry for the long delay. I think it looks OK now. Does this need to go
to the PCI list/maintainer?
Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-09 17:12 [PATCH v5] PCI hotplug: rpaphp: Error out on busy status from get-sensor-state Mahesh Salgaonkar
2022-04-08 14:18 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2022-04-25 22:39 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2022-04-26 1:44 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d7crdn7.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox