From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fault: fix wrong KUAP fault for IO_URING
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:15:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dnrrsbu.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1612014260.b4fac0liie.astroid@bobo.none>
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of January 30, 2021 9:22 pm:
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>>> +Aneesh
>>>
>>> Le 29/01/2021 à 07:52, Zorro Lang a écrit :
>> ..
>>>> [ 96.200296] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> [ 96.200304] Bug: Read fault blocked by KUAP!
>>>> [ 96.200309] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1876 at arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c:229 bad_kernel_fault+0x180/0x310
>>>
>>>> [ 96.200734] NIP [c000000000849424] fault_in_pages_readable+0x104/0x350
>>>> [ 96.200741] LR [c00000000084952c] fault_in_pages_readable+0x20c/0x350
>>>> [ 96.200747] --- interrupt: 300
>>>
>>>
>>> Problem happens in a section where userspace access is supposed to be granted, so the patch you
>>> proposed is definitely not the right fix.
>>>
>>> c000000000849408: 2c 01 00 4c isync
>>> c00000000084940c: a6 03 3d 7d mtspr 29,r9 <== granting userspace access permission
>>> c000000000849410: 2c 01 00 4c isync
>>> c000000000849414: 00 00 36 e9 ld r9,0(r22)
>>> c000000000849418: 20 00 29 81 lwz r9,32(r9)
>>> c00000000084941c: 00 02 29 71 andi. r9,r9,512
>>> c000000000849420: 78 d3 5e 7f mr r30,r26
>>> ==> c000000000849424: 00 00 bf 8b lbz r29,0(r31) <== accessing userspace
>>> c000000000849428: 10 00 82 41 beq c000000000849438 <fault_in_pages_readable+0x118>
>>> c00000000084942c: 2c 01 00 4c isync
>>> c000000000849430: a6 03 bd 7e mtspr 29,r21 <== clearing userspace access permission
>>> c000000000849434: 2c 01 00 4c isync
>>>
>>> My first guess is that the problem is linked to the following function, see the comment
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * For kernel thread that doesn't have thread.regs return
>>> * default AMR/IAMR values.
>>> */
>>> static inline u64 current_thread_amr(void)
>>> {
>>> if (current->thread.regs)
>>> return current->thread.regs->amr;
>>> return AMR_KUAP_BLOCKED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Above function was introduced by commit 48a8ab4eeb82 ("powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Don't update SPRN_AMR
>>> when in kernel mode")
>>
>> Yeah that's a bit of a curly one.
>>
>> At some point io_uring did kthread_use_mm(), which is supposed to mean
>> the kthread can operate on behalf of the original process that submitted
>> the IO.
>>
>> But because KUAP is implemented using memory protection keys, it depends
>> on the value of the AMR register, which is not part of the mm, it's in
>> thread.regs->amr.
>>
>> And what's worse by the time we're in kthread_use_mm() we no longer have
>> access to the thread.regs->amr of the original process that submitted
>> the IO.
>>
>> We also can't simply move the AMR into the mm, precisely because it's
>> per thread, not per mm.
>>
>> So TBH I don't know how we're going to fix this.
>>
>> I guess we could return AMR=unblocked for kernel threads, but that's
>> arguably a bug because it allows a process to circumvent memory keys by
>> asking the kernel to do the access.
>
> We shouldn't need to inherit AMR should we? We only need it to be locked
> for kernel threads until it's explicitly unlocked -- nothing mm specific
> there. I think current_thread_amr could return 0 for kernel threads? Or
> I would even avoid using that function for allow_user_access and open
> code the kthread case and remove it from current_thread_amr().
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
Can we try this?
commit 9a193d38b1a0a52364bc70ec953e0685993603b6
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Feb 2 09:23:38 2021 +0530
powerpc/kuap: Allow kernel thread to access userspace after kthread_use_mm
This fix the bad fault reported by KUAP when io_wqe_worker access userspace.
Bug: Read fault blocked by KUAP!
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 101841 at arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c:229 __do_page_fault+0x6b4/0xcd0
NIP [c00000000009e7e4] __do_page_fault+0x6b4/0xcd0
LR [c00000000009e7e0] __do_page_fault+0x6b0/0xcd0
..........
Call Trace:
[c000000016367330] [c00000000009e7e0] __do_page_fault+0x6b0/0xcd0 (unreliable)
[c0000000163673e0] [c00000000009ee3c] do_page_fault+0x3c/0x120
[c000000016367430] [c00000000000c848] handle_page_fault+0x10/0x2c
--- interrupt: 300 at iov_iter_fault_in_readable+0x148/0x6f0
..........
NIP [c0000000008e8228] iov_iter_fault_in_readable+0x148/0x6f0
LR [c0000000008e834c] iov_iter_fault_in_readable+0x26c/0x6f0
interrupt: 300
[c0000000163677e0] [c0000000007154a0] iomap_write_actor+0xc0/0x280
[c000000016367880] [c00000000070fc94] iomap_apply+0x1c4/0x780
[c000000016367990] [c000000000710330] iomap_file_buffered_write+0xa0/0x120
[c0000000163679e0] [c00800000040791c] xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x314/0x5e0 [xfs]
[c000000016367a90] [c0000000006d74bc] io_write+0x10c/0x460
[c000000016367bb0] [c0000000006d80e4] io_issue_sqe+0x8d4/0x1200
[c000000016367c70] [c0000000006d8ad0] io_wq_submit_work+0xc0/0x250
[c000000016367cb0] [c0000000006e2578] io_worker_handle_work+0x498/0x800
[c000000016367d40] [c0000000006e2cdc] io_wqe_worker+0x3fc/0x4f0
[c000000016367da0] [c0000000001cb0a4] kthread+0x1c4/0x1d0
[c000000016367e10] [c00000000000dbf0] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x6c
The kernel consider thread AMR value for kernel thread to be
AMR_KUAP_BLOCKED. Hence access to userspace is denied. This
of course not correct and we should allow userspace access after
kthread_use_mm(). To be precise, kthread_use_mm() should inherit the
AMR value of the operating address space. But, the AMR value is
thread-specific and we inherit the address space and not thread
access restrictions. Because of this ignore AMR value when accessing
userspace via kernel thread.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
index f50f72e535aa..7457d80ba0bb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
@@ -384,7 +384,13 @@ static __always_inline void allow_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user
// This is written so we can resolve to a single case at build time
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(dir));
- if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_PKEY))
+ /*
+ * if it is a kthread that did kthread_use_mm() don't
+ * use current_thread_amr().
+ */
+ if (!current->mm && current->active_mm != &init_mm)
+ thread_amr = 0;
+ else if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_PKEY))
thread_amr = current_thread_amr();
if (dir == KUAP_READ)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 14:56 [PATCH] powerpc/fault: fix wrong KUAP fault for IO_URING Zorro Lang
2021-01-27 16:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-01-27 19:29 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-28 0:18 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-28 3:13 ` Zorro Lang
2021-01-28 3:06 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-28 13:52 ` Zorro Lang
2021-01-28 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-28 14:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-01-28 15:20 ` Zorro Lang
2021-01-29 6:52 ` Zorro Lang
2021-01-29 12:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-01-30 11:22 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-30 13:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-02 4:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2021-02-02 5:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-02-02 6:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-02 6:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-02-02 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-02 6:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-02-02 9:49 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-04 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 17:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-02-04 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 17:57 ` Zorro Lang
2021-02-04 17:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dnrrsbu.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).