From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E782BC43331 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19978208C3 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:37:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 19978208C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46QH992kJ8zDr8p for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 11:37:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bauerman@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46QH6p0BmczDr7h for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 11:35:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x871VcxL039606; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 21:35:05 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uuwcns85u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:35:05 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x871WNcd041002; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 21:35:04 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uuwcns85h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:35:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x871YncW013303; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:35:03 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2uqgh7faxb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 07 Sep 2019 01:35:03 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x871Z35r52560288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:35:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281D9AE060; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:35:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE52EAE05C; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:35:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain (unknown [9.85.199.12]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:35:00 +0000 (GMT) References: <20190823194919.30916-1-svens@stackframe.org> <22b40bb7-6f86-0a69-12b2-12d90124173d@gmx.de> <87blvxgkqw.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Helge Deller Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] kexec: add generic support for elf kernel images In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 22:34:57 -0300 Message-ID: <87a7bghose.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-07_01:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909070015 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Sven Schnelle , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Helge Deller writes: > On 06.09.19 23:47, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> Helge Deller writes: >>> This kexec patch series is the groundwork for kexec on the parisc architecture. >>> Since we want kexec on parisc, I've applied it to my for-next-kexec tree [1], >>> and can push it to Linus in the next merge window through the parisc tree [2]. >> >> I just had a look at this version and it looks fine to me. Identical to >> the version I reviewed before except for the changes I suggested. >> Thanks, Sven! >> >>> If someone has any objections, or if you prefer to take it through >>> a kexec or powerpc tree, please let me know. >>> >>> Helge >>> >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/log/?h=for-next-kexec >>> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/log/?h=for-next >> >> I noticed that the first patch is the only one that doesn't have my >> Reviewed-by. If you want, you can add it: >> >> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > Thanks for reviewing again! > I added your Reviewed-by to the patches in the for-next tree. Thanks! -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center