linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, sbhat@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	gautam@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: PPC: Use getters and setters for vcpu register state
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:25:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyzm73jt.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807014553.1168699-2-jniethe5@gmail.com>

Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> There are already some getter and setter functions used for accessing
> vcpu register state, e.g. kvmppc_get_pc(). There are also more
> complicated examples that are generated by macros like
> kvmppc_get_sprg0() which are generated by the SHARED_SPRNG_WRAPPER()
> macro.
>

...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> index bbf5e2c5fe09..1a7e837ea2d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> @@ -403,10 +413,121 @@ static inline ulong kvmppc_get_fault_dar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
...
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
> +static inline void kvmppc_get_vsx_vr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i, vector128 *v)
> +{
> +	*v =  vcpu->arch.vr.vr[i];
> +}

This is causing build errors if VSX is disabled.

I'm using g5_defconfig plus:

  CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION=y
  CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64=y
  CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR=y

Which gives me:

  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c: In function ‘kvmppc_set_vmx_dword’:
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1061:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kvmppc_get_vsx_vr’; did you mean ‘kvmppc_get_vsx_fpr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   1061 |         kvmppc_get_vsx_vr(vcpu, index, &val.vval);
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |         kvmppc_get_vsx_fpr
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1063:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kvmppc_set_vsx_vr’; did you mean ‘kvmppc_set_vsx_fpr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   1063 |         kvmppc_set_vsx_vr(vcpu, index, &val.vval);
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |         kvmppc_set_vsx_fpr
  In file included from ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:25:
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c: In function ‘kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg’:
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1729:52: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kvmppc_get_vscr’; did you mean ‘kvmppc_get_sr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   1729 |                         val = get_reg_val(reg->id, kvmppc_get_vscr(vcpu));
        |                                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h:412:29: note: in definition of macro ‘get_reg_val’
    412 |         case 4: __u.wval = (reg); break;        \
        |                             ^~~
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c: In function ‘kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg’:
  ../arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1780:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kvmppc_set_vscr’; did you mean ‘kvmppc_set_fscr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   1780 |                         kvmppc_set_vscr(vcpu, set_reg_val(reg->id, val));
        |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                         kvmppc_set_fscr


Looking at kvm_vcpu_arch, the thread_vr_state and members are guarded by
CONFIG_ALTIVEC, not CONFIG_VSX.

Switching to that fixes the build.

Whether it makes sense to be getting/setting those registers when VSX=n
is not immediately clear, but is a separate problem.

cheers

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-07  1:45 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: PPC: Nested APIv2 guest support Jordan Niethe
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: PPC: Use getters and setters for vcpu register state Jordan Niethe
2023-08-14  8:08   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-08-16  3:11     ` Jordan Niethe
2023-08-17  3:25   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: PPC: Rename accessor generator macros Jordan Niethe
2023-08-14  8:27   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-08-16  3:20     ` Jordan Niethe
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: PPC: Add helper library for Guest State Buffers Jordan Niethe
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: PPC: Book3s HV: Hold LPIDs in an unsigned long Jordan Niethe
2023-08-14  8:12   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-08-15 10:45     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-08-16  3:21       ` Jordan Niethe
2023-08-16  3:14     ` Jordan Niethe
2023-08-14  8:15   ` David Laight
2023-08-16  3:19     ` Jordan Niethe
2023-08-17 12:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: PPC: Add support for nestedv2 guests Jordan Niethe
2023-08-17  4:19   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-08-17 12:23   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-08-07  1:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] docs: powerpc: Document nested KVM on POWER Jordan Niethe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cyzm73jt.fsf@mail.lhotse \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).