From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Send SIGBUS from machine_check
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:57:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d019yd0w.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001170557.10915-1-joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com> writes:
> Embedded PPC CPU should send SIGBUS to user space when applicable.
Yeah, but it's not clear that it's applicable in all cases.
At least I need some reasoning for why it's safe in all cases below to
just send a SIGBUS and take no other action.
Is there a particular CPU you're working on? Can we start with that and
look at all the machine check causes and which can be safely handled.
Some comments below ...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index 0381242920d9..12715d24141c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,11 @@ int machine_check_e500mc(struct pt_regs *regs)
At the beginning of the function we have:
printk("Machine check in kernel mode.\n");
Which should be updated.
> reason & MCSR_MEA ? "Effective" : "Physical", addr);
> }
>
> + if ((user_mode(regs))) {
> + _exception(SIGBUS, regs, reason, regs->nip);
> + recoverable = 1;
> + }
For most of the error causes we take no action and set recoverable = 0.
Then you just declare that it is recoverable because it hit in
userspace. Depending on the cause that might be OK, but it's not
obviously correct in all cases.
> +
> silent_out:
> mtspr(SPRN_MCSR, mcsr);
> return mfspr(SPRN_MCSR) == 0 && recoverable;
> @@ -665,6 +670,10 @@ int machine_check_e500(struct pt_regs *regs)
Same comment about the printk().
> if (reason & MCSR_BUS_RPERR)
> printk("Bus - Read Parity Error\n");
>
> + if ((user_mode(regs))) {
> + _exception(SIGBUS, regs, reason, regs->nip);
> + return 1;
> + }
And same comment more or less.
Other than the MCSR_BUS_RBERR cases that are explicitly checked, the
function does nothing to clear the cause of the machine check.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -695,6 +704,10 @@ int machine_check_e200(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (reason & MCSR_BUS_WRERR)
> printk("Bus - Write Bus Error on buffered store or cache line push\n");
>
> + if ((user_mode(regs))) {
> + _exception(SIGBUS, regs, reason, regs->nip);
> + return 1;
> + }
Same.
> return 0;
> }
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
> @@ -731,6 +744,10 @@ int machine_check_generic(struct pt_regs *regs)
> default:
> printk("Unknown values in msr\n");
> }
> + if ((user_mode(regs))) {
> + _exception(SIGBUS, regs, reason, regs->nip);
> + return 1;
> + }
Same.
> return 0;
> }
> #endif /* everything else */
> --
> 2.26.2
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-23 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 17:05 [PATCH] powerpc: Send SIGBUS from machine_check Joakim Tjernlund
2020-10-22 11:19 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2020-10-23 0:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-10-23 9:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d019yd0w.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox