From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: kvm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 20:45:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d09tsrf0.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200303085039.GA1323622@kroah.com>
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 06:46:23PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
>> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
>> > never do something different based on this.
>>
>> Except it does need to do something different, if the file was created
>> it needs to be removed in the remove path.
>>
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
>> > index bfe4f106cffc..8e4791c6f2af 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
>> > @@ -207,19 +207,12 @@ static const struct file_operations kvmppc_exit_timing_fops = {
>> > void kvmppc_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id)
>> > {
>> > static char dbg_fname[50];
>> > - struct dentry *debugfs_file;
>> >
>> > snprintf(dbg_fname, sizeof(dbg_fname), "vm%u_vcpu%u_timing",
>> > current->pid, id);
>> > - debugfs_file = debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666,
>> > - kvm_debugfs_dir, vcpu,
>> > - &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
>> > -
>> > - if (!debugfs_file) {
>> > - printk(KERN_ERR"%s: error creating debugfs file %s\n",
>> > - __func__, dbg_fname);
>> > - return;
>> > - }
>> > + debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666, kvm_debugfs_dir, vcpu,
>> > + &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
>> > +
>> >
>> > vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = debugfs_file;
>
> Ugh, you are right, how did I miss that? How is 0-day missing this?
> It's been in my tree for a long time, odd.
This code isn't enabled by default, or in any defconfig. So it's only
allmodconfig that would trip it, I guess 0-day isn't doing powerpc
allmodconfig builds.
>> I squashed this in, which seems to work:
...
>>
>> void kvmppc_remove_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - if (vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing) {
>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing)) {
>> debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
>> vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = NULL;
>> }
>
> No, this can just be:
> debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
>
> No need to check anything, just call it and the debugfs code can handle
> it just fine.
Oh duh, of course, I should have checked.
I'd still like to NULL out the debugfs_exit_timing member, so I'll do:
void kvmppc_remove_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = NULL;
}
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 10:58 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: kernel: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: kvm: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 7:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-03 8:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 9:45 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-03-03 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 10:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc: mm: book3s64: hash_utils: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: mm: ptdump: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: cell: axon_msi: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: powernv: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-10 15:01 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-10 15:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 9:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-06 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: kernel: " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d09tsrf0.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).