From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 02/25] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:40:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d17uylkq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817154831.GB5505@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:25:39PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>
>> Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:
>> > static inline void pkey_initialize(void)
>> > {
>> > + int os_reserved, i;
>> > +
>> > /* disable the pkey system till everything
>> > * is in place. A patch further down the
>> > * line will enable it.
>> > */
>> > pkey_inited = false;
>> > +
>> > + /* Lets assume 32 keys */
>> > + pkeys_total = 32;
>> > +
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES
>> > + /*
>> > + * the OS can manage only 8 pkeys
>> > + * due to its inability to represent
>> > + * them in the linux 4K-PTE.
>> > + */
>> > + os_reserved = pkeys_total-8;
>> > +#else
>> > + os_reserved = 0;
>> > +#endif
>> > + /*
>> > + * Bits are in LE format.
>> > + * NOTE: 1, 0 are reserved.
>> > + * key 0 is the default key, which allows read/write/execute.
>> > + * key 1 is recommended not to be used.
>> > + * PowerISA(3.0) page 1015, programming note.
>> > + */
>> > + initial_allocation_mask = ~0x0;
>> > + for (i = 2; i < (pkeys_total - os_reserved); i++)
>> > + initial_allocation_mask &= ~(0x1<<i);
>> > }
>> > #endif /*_ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H */
>>
>> In v6, key 31 was also reserved, but it's not in this version. Is this
>> intentional?
>
> On powernv platform, there is no hypervisor and hence the hypervisor
> will not reserve key 31 for its own use. Wherease on PAPR guest
> the hypervisor takes away key 31.
>
> Its not possible to determine at compile time which keys are used
> or not. Hence the above code. pkeys_total is 32 in this patch,
> but will be set to whatever value the device tree tells us. That will
> be done in a subsequent patch.
You're right. At the time I made that comment I didn't realize that the
hypervisor would subtract its reserved key from the device property.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 0:12 [RFC v7 00/25] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 01/25] powerpc: define an additional vma bit for protection keys Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 02/25] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys Ram Pai
2017-08-10 20:25 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11 5:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 16:00 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 15:48 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 20:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2017-10-18 2:42 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 3:40 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:08 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 22:04 ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 03/25] powerpc: helper function to read, write AMR, IAMR, UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 04/25] powerpc: helper functions to initialize AMR, IAMR and " Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 05/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR, iAMR when a key is allocated or freed Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 06/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_set_user_pkey_access() Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 07/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_alloc() and sys_pkey_free() system calls Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 08/25] powerpc: ability to create execute-disabled pkeys Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 09/25] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-08-10 20:46 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11 6:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 16:41 ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 10/25] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 11/25] powerpc: ability to associate pkey to a vma Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 12/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Ram Pai
2017-10-18 15:58 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 21:37 ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 13/25] powerpc: map vma key-protection bits to pte key bits Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 14/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_mprotect() system call Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 15/25] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:15 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 22:12 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-19 5:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 16/25] powerpc: helper to validate key-access permissions of a pte Ram Pai
2017-10-18 16:08 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-10-18 21:56 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-19 5:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 17/25] powerpc: check key protection for user page access Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 18/25] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 19/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted() Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 20/25] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 21/25] powerpc: capture AMR register content on " Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 22/25] powerpc: introduce get_pte_pkey() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 23/25] powerpc: capture the violated protection key on fault Ram Pai
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 24/25] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-08-10 21:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-11 10:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-17 17:14 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 4:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 17:04 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 21:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-08-18 22:36 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 2:25 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 3:01 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 22:49 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-19 8:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-07-31 0:12 ` [RFC v7 25/25] powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem Ram Pai
2017-08-10 21:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-17 17:40 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-17 20:30 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-17 23:48 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 5:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 15:26 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-18 16:32 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-11 17:34 ` [RFC v7 26/25] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-18 0:25 ` Ram Pai
2017-08-18 23:19 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d17uylkq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).