linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Support for 24x7 hcall interface version 2
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:02:38 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efu3db41.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87injhd2h2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>


Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> The hypervisor interface to access 24x7 performance counters (which collect
>> performance information from system power on to system power off) has been
>> extended in POWER9 adding new fields to the request and result element
>> structures.
>>
>> Also, results for some domains now return more than one result element and
>> those need to be added to get a total count.
>>
>> The first two patches fix bugs in the existing code. The following 4
>> patches are code improvements and the last two finally implement support
>> for the changes in POWER9 described above.
>>
>> POWER8 systems only support version 1 of the interface, while POWER9
>> systems only support version 2. I tested these patches on POWER8 to verify
>> that there are no regressions, and also on POWER9 DD1.
>
> Where is version 2 documented?

Only in an internal specification.

> And what happens when we boot on a POWER9 in POWER8 compatibility mode?

It will still use version 2 of the API, and still require aggregation of
result elements. Does this mean that hv_24x7_init should check
cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type for "ppc64/power9" instead of
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)?

There were a couple of comments from Suka which still needed resolving:

Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Thiago Jung Bauermann [bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * get_count_from_result - get event count from the given result
>> + *
>> + * @event:	Event associated with @res.
>> + * @resb:	Result buffer containing @res.
>> + * @res:	Result to work on.
>> + * @countp:	Output variable containing the event count.
>> + * @next:	Optional output variable pointing to the next result in @resb.
>> + */
>> +static int get_count_from_result(struct perf_event *event,
>> +				 struct hv_24x7_data_result_buffer *resb,
>> +				 struct hv_24x7_result *res, u64 *countp,
>> +				 struct hv_24x7_result **next)
>> +{
>> +	u16 num_elements = be16_to_cpu(res->num_elements_returned);
>> +	u16 data_size = be16_to_cpu(res->result_element_data_size);
>> +	unsigned int data_offset;
>> +	void *element_data;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We can bail out early if the result is empty.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!num_elements) {
>> +		pr_debug("Result of request %hhu is empty, nothing to do\n",
>> +			 res->result_ix);
>> +
>> +		if (next)
>> +			*next = (struct hv_24x7_result *) res->elements;
>> +
>> +		return -ENODATA;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This code assumes that a result has only one element.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (num_elements != 1) {
>> +		pr_debug("Error: result of request %hhu has %hu elements\n",
>> +			 res->result_ix, num_elements);
>
> Could this happen due to an user request or would this indicate a bug
> in the way we submitted the request (perf should submit separate request
> for each lpar/index - we set ->max_ix and ->max_num_lpars to cpu_be16(1).

By specifying 1 as the maximum for the smallest resource we're
requesting, we guarantee one element per result. Since that's what we
do this would indeed be a bug. For v2 (which I'll send shortly) I
changed the message above to a pr_err, and changed the returned error to
-EIO instead of -ENOTSUPP.

> Minor inconsistency with proceeding, is that if the next element passes,
> this return code is lost/over written. IOW, h_24x7_event_commit_txn()'s
> return value depends on the last element we process, even if intermediate
> ones encounter an error.

For v2, I changed h_24x7_event_commit_txn to break out of the loop if
there's an error in any processed result. Also, since in that case @next
isn't used anymore, get_count_from_result will exit early instead of
going through the motions.

>> +
>> +		if (!next)
>> +			return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * We still need to go through the motions so that we can return
>> +		 * a pointer to the next result.
>> +		 */
>> +		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (data_size != sizeof(u64)) {
>> +		pr_debug("Error: result of request %hhu has data of %hu bytes\n",
>> +			 res->result_ix, data_size);
>> +
>> +		if (!next)
>> +			return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (resb->interface_version == 1)
>> +		data_offset = offsetof(struct hv_24x7_result_element_v1,
>> +				       element_data);
>> +	else
>> +		data_offset = offsetof(struct hv_24x7_result_element_v2,
>> +				       element_data);
>> +
>> +	element_data = res->elements + data_offset;
>> +
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		*countp = be64_to_cpu(*((u64 *) element_data));
>> +
>> +	/* The next result is after the result element. */
>> +	if (next)
>> +		*next = element_data + data_size;
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int single_24x7_request(struct perf_event *event, u64 *count)
>>  {
>>  	int ret;
>> -	u16 num_elements;
>> -	struct hv_24x7_result *result;
>>  	struct hv_24x7_request_buffer *request_buffer;
>>  	struct hv_24x7_data_result_buffer *result_buffer;
>> 
>> @@ -1158,14 +1259,9 @@ static int single_24x7_request(struct perf_event *event, u64 *count)
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		goto out;
>> 
>> -	result = result_buffer->results;
>> -
>> -	/* This code assumes that a result has only one element. */
>> -	num_elements = be16_to_cpu(result->num_elements_returned);
>> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(num_elements != 1);
>> -
>>  	/* process result from hcall */
>> -	*count = be64_to_cpu(result->elements[0].element_data[0]);
>> +	ret = get_count_from_result(event, result_buffer,
>> +				    result_buffer->results, count, NULL);
>> 
>>  out:
>>  	put_cpu_var(hv_24x7_reqb);
>> @@ -1425,16 +1521,13 @@ static int h_24x7_event_commit_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
>>  	for (i = 0, res = result_buffer->results;
>>  	     i < result_buffer->num_results; i++, res = next_res) {
>>  		struct perf_event *event = h24x7hw->events[res->result_ix];
>> -		u16 num_elements = be16_to_cpu(res->num_elements_returned);
>> -		u16 data_size = be16_to_cpu(res->result_element_data_size);
>> 
>> -		/* This code assumes that a result has only one element. */
>> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(num_elements != 1);
>> +		ret = get_count_from_result(event, result_buffer, res, &count,
>> +					    &next_res);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			continue;
>> 
>> -		count = be64_to_cpu(res->elements[0].element_data[0]);
>>  		update_event_count(event, count);
>> -
>> -		next_res = (void *) res->elements[0].element_data + data_size;
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	put_cpu_var(hv_24x7_hw);

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-28 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-01 21:02 [PATCH 0/8] Support for 24x7 hcall interface version 2 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix passing of catalog version number Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix off-by-one error in request_buffer check Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Properly iterate through results Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc-perf/hx-24x7: Don't log failed hcall twice Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix return value of hcalls Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Minor improvements Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Support v2 of the hypervisor API Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-14  0:13   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2017-06-14 22:25     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-01 21:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Aggregate result elements on POWER9 SMT8 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-14  4:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] Support for 24x7 hcall interface version 2 Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2017-06-27 12:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-28 22:02   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2017-06-29  5:14     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87efu3db41.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).