linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Dave Vasilevsky <dave@vasilevsky.ca>
Cc: glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, bhe@redhat.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Reimar Döffinger" <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash: Default to CRASH_DUMP=n when support for it is unlikely
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:02:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frqsghws.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVYNhFJ+qBDP3_fi9oeHsgOL0vqPe1YqE18+M8n1onssw@mail.gmail.com>

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:54 PM Dave Vasilevsky <dave@vasilevsky.ca> wrote:
>> Fixes boot failures on 6.9 on PPC_BOOK3S_32 machines using
>> Open Firmware. On these machines, the kernel refuses to boot
>> from non-zero PHYSICAL_START, which occurs when CRASH_DUMP is on.
>>
>> Since most PPC_BOOK3S_32 machines boot via Open Firmware, it should
>> default to off for them. Users booting via some other mechanism
>> can still turn it on explicitly.
>>
>> Also defaults to CRASH_DUMP=n on sh.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Vasilevsky <dave@vasilevsky.ca>
>> Reported-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
>> Closes: https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2024/07/msg00001.html
>> Fixes: 75bc255a7444 ("crash: clean up kdump related config items")
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
>> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ config KEXEC_JUMP
>>
>>  config CRASH_DUMP
>>         bool "kernel crash dumps"
>> -       default y
>> +       default ARCH_DEFAULT_CRASH_DUMP
>>         depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
>>         depends on KEXEC_CORE
>>         select VMCORE_INFO
>
> IMHO CRASH_DUMP should just default to n, like most kernel options, as
> it enables non-trivial extra functionality: the kernel source tree has
> more than 100 locations that check if CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is enabled.
>
> Letting it default to enabled also conflicts with the spirit of the
> help text for the symbol:
>
>           Generate crash dump after being started by kexec.
>           This should be normally only set in special crash dump kernels
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>           which are loaded in the main kernel with kexec-tools into
>           a specially reserved region and then later executed after
>           a crash by kdump/kexec. The crash dump kernel must be compiled
>           to a memory address not used by the main kernel or BIOS using
>           PHYSICAL_START, or it must be built as a relocatable image
>           (CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y).
>           For more details see Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
>
>           For s390, this option also enables zfcpdump.
>           See also <file:Documentation/arch/s390/zfcpdump.rst>
>
> What is so special about CRASH_DUMP, that it should be enabled by
> default?
 
The reality is that essentially all distros enable it. Because they
don't want to manage separate kernel / crash-kernel packages.

So IMHO having it enabled by default in upstream does make sense,
because it more closely matches what distros/users actually run.

cheers


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-23 12:51 [PATCH] crash: Default to CRASH_DUMP=n when support for it is unlikely Dave Vasilevsky
2024-08-23 13:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-23 18:16   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-08-27  6:22     ` Baoquan He
2024-08-27  6:37       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-08-27  9:01         ` Baoquan He
2024-08-26  2:02   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-08-26  5:38     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-08-26  6:03       ` Dave Vasilevsky
2024-08-30  3:15 ` Baoquan He
2024-08-30  3:37   ` Dave Vasilevsky
2024-08-30  6:30     ` Baoquan He
2024-08-30  6:35 ` Baoquan He
2024-08-30  7:24   ` Dave Vasilevsky
2024-09-08 19:57 ` Dave Vasilevsky
2024-09-09  2:35   ` Baoquan He
2024-09-09  6:40   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frqsghws.fsf@mail.lhotse \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@vasilevsky.ca \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).