Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: thp: Fix crash on mremap

["Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 09:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > 
>> > This patch fix the below crash
>> > 
>> > NIP [c00000000004cee4] .__hash_page_thp+0x2a4/0x440
>> > LR [c0000000000439ac] .hash_page+0x18c/0x5e0
>> > ...
>> > Call Trace:
>> > [c000000736103c40] [00001ffffb000000] 0x1ffffb000000(unreliable)
>> > [437908.479693] [c000000736103d50] [c0000000000439ac] .hash_page+0x18c/0x5e0
>> > [437908.479699] [c000000736103e30] [c00000000000924c] .do_hash_page+0x4c/0x58
>> > 
>> > On ppc64 we use the pgtable for storing the hpte slot information and
>> > store address to the pgtable at a constant offset (PTRS_PER_PMD) from
>> > pmd. On mremap, when we switch the pmd, we need to withdraw and deposit
>> > the pgtable again, so that we find the pgtable at PTRS_PER_PMD offset
>> > from new pmd.
>> > 
>> > We also want to move the withdraw and deposit before the set_pmd so
>> > that, when page fault find the pmd as trans huge we can be sure that
>> > pgtable can be located at the offset.
>> > 
>> > variant of upstream SHA1: b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f
>> > for 3.12 stable series
>> 
>> This doesn't look like a "variant", it looks totally different.  Why
>> can't I just take the b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f patch
>> (and follow-on fix) for 3.12?
>> 
>> I _REALLY_ dislike patches that are totally different from Linus's tree
>> in stable trees, it has caused nothing but problems in the past.
>
> I don't think it applies... (I tried on an internal tree) but the
> affected function changed in 3.13 in various ways. Aneesh, please
> provide a more details explanation and whether we should backport those
> other changes too or whether this is not necessary

Yes the affected function added support for split ptl locks for huge
pte. I don't think that is a stable material.

.
>
> BTW. Aneesh, we need a 3.11.x one too
>

3.11.x it is already applied.

-aneesh