From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:23:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7pfhac3.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160617472873.1817800.16473753588453276266.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Thanks sfr and mpe.
> Applied to powerpc/fixes.
>
> [1/1] powerpc/64s: Fix allnoconfig build since uaccess flush
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b6b79dd53082db11070b4368d85dd6699ff0b063
We also needed a similar fix for stable, which has also been applied.
I guess I should build some sort of build process that tests a whole
range of configs. I did test a few but clearly not enough. Is there a
known list that I should be using? Something from kisskb?
Kind regards,
Daniel
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:40:16 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> After merging most of the trees, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
>> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h:18,
>> from arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:9,
>> from include/linux/uaccess.h:11,
>> from include/linux/sched/task.h:11,
>> from include/linux/sched/signal.h:9,
>> from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6,
>> from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7,
>> from include/linux/fs.h:33,
>> from include/linux/compat.h:17,
>> from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:14:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:66:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
>> 66 | DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(uaccess_flush_key);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:66:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE' [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:66:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h: In function 'prevent_user_access':
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:180:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'static_branch_unlikely' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 180 | if (static_branch_unlikely(&uaccess_flush_key))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:180:30: error: 'uaccess_flush_key' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> 180 | if (static_branch_unlikely(&uaccess_flush_key))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:180:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h: In function 'prevent_user_access_return':
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:189:30: error: 'uaccess_flush_key' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> 189 | if (static_branch_unlikely(&uaccess_flush_key))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h: In function 'restore_user_access':
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:198:30: error: 'uaccess_flush_key' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> 198 | if (static_branch_unlikely(&uaccess_flush_key) && flags == AMR_KUAP_BLOCKED)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 7:40 linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-23 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-24 0:23 ` Daniel Axtens [this message]
2020-11-25 2:47 ` Michael Ellerman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-27 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-12 2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:50 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-06 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7pfhac3.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net \
--to=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox