From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35774C04AAF for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4FB620856 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:12:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B4FB620856 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457bm22f1YzDqPw for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:12:50 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=fweimer@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 457bjr5KmKzDqGv for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:10:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A31313086231; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (dhcp-192-219.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.219]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52692665F4; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:10:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] open: add close_range() References: <20190521113448.20654-1-christian@brauner.io> <87tvdoau12.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190521130438.q3u4wvve7p6md6cm@brauner.io> Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 15:10:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190521130438.q3u4wvve7p6md6cm@brauner.io> (Christian Brauner's message of "Tue, 21 May 2019 15:04:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87h89o9cng.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Tue, 21 May 2019 13:10:47 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, x86@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, tkjos@android.com, arnd@arndb.de, jannh@google.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, ldv@altlinux.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" * Christian Brauner: >> Solaris has an fdwalk function: >> >> >> >> So a different way to implement this would expose a nextfd system call > > Meh. If nextfd() then I would like it to be able to: > - get the nextfd(fd) >= fd > - get highest open fd e.g. nextfd(-1) The highest open descriptor isn't istering for fdwalk because nextfd would just fail. > But then I wonder if nextfd() needs to be a syscall and isn't just > either: > fcntl(fd, F_GET_NEXT)? > or > prctl(PR_GET_NEXT)? I think the fcntl route is a bit iffy because you might need it to get the *first* valid descriptor. >> to userspace, so that we can use that to implement both fdwalk and >> closefrom. But maybe fdwalk is just too obscure, given the existence of >> /proc. > > Yeah we probably don't need fdwalk. Agreed. Just wanted to bring it up for completeness. I certainly don't want to derail the implementation of close_range. Thanks, Florian