From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427y7p2w0fzF3Cc for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:00:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8A5xkWr144252 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:00:20 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mdffuxkux-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:00:19 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:00:17 +0100 From: Vaibhav Jain To: Stewart Smith , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman Cc: Michael Neuling , Nicholas Piggin , Vasant Hegde , "Oliver O'Halloran" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Make possible for user to force a full ipl cec reboot In-Reply-To: <87worut1c7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180901081745.2165-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> <87worut1c7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:30:10 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <87h8ixj3it.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thanks for looking into this patch Stewart Stewart Smith writes: > We're about to introduce an MPIPL reboot type (to take a firmware > assisted kdump style thing), and we maybe should have a reboot type to > force attempting a fast-reboot, and this makes me think if we should add > those in now? I will probably let Vasant and others answer that. > If the reboot type isn't supported, what should be the behvaiour? Reboot > the default way or don't reboot at all? Yes, I have addressed that in v3 of this patch at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/967248/. In case the reboot type isnt supported or if there is an error invoking it, the patch will revert back to calling opal_cec_reboot(). -- Vaibhav Jain Linux Technology Center, IBM India Pvt. Ltd.