From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
phileas-fogg@mail.ru, geoff@infradead.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Make context bits depend on virtual addr size.
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:37:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87halgjde0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwv8jnmj.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> writes:
>
>>> +#define CONTEXT_BITS 19
>>> +#define USER_ESID_BITS 18
>>> +#define USER_ESID_BITS_1T 6
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * 256MB segment
>>> + * The proto-VSID space has 2^(CONTEX_BITS + USER_ESID_BITS) - 1 segments
>>> + * available for user + kernel mapping. The top 4 contexts are used for
>>> + * kernel mapping. Each segment contains 2^28 bytes. Each
>>> + * context maps 2^46 bytes (64TB) so we can support 2^19-1 contexts
>>> + * (19 == 37 + 28 - 46).
>>> + */
>>
>> I can't help feeling this would be easier to understand if a full
>> 64? 80? bit address was shown with the various bit ranges identified.
>>
>> Given the comment, I'd have expected CONTEXT_BITS to be calculated
>> from three other named constants - rather than being set to 19.
>>
>
> May be the comments were misleading. We build proto vsid using a
> combination of context and ea bits.
>
> Current code does the below:
>
> for kernel:
> proto_vsid = ea >> SID_SHIFT;
> proto_vsid |= (1UL << (CONTEXT_BITS + USER_ESID_BITS));
> for user:
> proto_vsid = ea >> SID_SHIFT
> proto_vsid |= context << USER_ESID_BITS
>
> context range is 0 - (2^19 -1)
>
> With this patch we _don't_ give kernel half the proto vsid range.
> Instead, we reduce the proto vsid range and then the kernel is given
> top 4 context. ie, kernel proto vsid is now
>
> for kenel:
> proto_vsid = ea >> SID_SHIFT;
> context = (MAX_CONTEXT - 4) + ((effective address >> 60) - 0xc);
> proto_vsid |= context << USER_ESID_BITS
>
Hmm that may be an issue, considering ESID for kernel is 36 bits.
We have overlapping bits between shifted value of context and kernel
ESID.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-12 18:31 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Make VSID_BITS* dependency explicit Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-02-12 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Make context bits depend on virtual addr size Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-02-12 20:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-02-13 3:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-02-13 3:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-02-13 11:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-02-13 13:27 ` David Laight
2013-02-13 14:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-02-13 18:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-02-13 18:13 ` Re[2]: " Phileas Fogg
2013-02-13 20:09 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87halgjde0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=phileas-fogg@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).