From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0DAC04FF3 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF40613BC for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:34:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CF40613BC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fpppk4y32z2yxv for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:34:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gzA11SQ/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=msc@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gzA11SQ/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fppp75Xqcz2yhF for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:33:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14OK3nfj185241; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:33:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=references : from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=pp1; bh=FZyIYp++kLFd7+FZB7WEKrumdZ2aEQqCESOGbyT5Kxg=; b=gzA11SQ/YmnbE/fTjFn3zFl6e4vEnPt3lXbRRoYCVuYBcdi6mi3FYoUOLGIL3LQaVTlO MZ8ZBOV6Ku6HNxyalbBbGi1F5QVVAYJ5T8LN5AWOVAjrr0dXiElnI/OBa8fEFf+rzKQZ JgmyOdUyvrWc8UaTObizkwtGwemhCKutQVf6oUj3u+gEp0QQ6TbJWeeU0nf2g+rjP29M i8/T0hr5RsrAgO1+qUM/0xyRjIzR1cRluaiUYFUgwHpL+niwB/VkFKfDqzrL1sbk3iPK p6iZfxNVMMQW2Rw4QB0xoBS0CE57L2QBcMq28SnKQWrMajB5iDt5/0cqP6Sn3DriDBIg yw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38rjjp0yqt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 May 2021 16:33:32 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14OK3ohP185380; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:33:31 -0400 Received: from ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (aa.5b.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.91.170]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38rjjp0yqj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 May 2021 16:33:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14OKHPkF018856; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:30 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38psk99ta7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:30 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14OKXTHR21496212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:29 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8741CBE053; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743DFBE058; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TP480.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.94.141]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:33:26 +0000 (GMT) References: <20200611081203.995112-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20210518231331.GA8464@altlinux.org> <1621385544.nttlk5qugb.astroid@bobo.none> <1621400263.gf0mbqhkrf.astroid@bobo.none> <87a6oo4312.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <87k0nr6ezw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87eedz3li3.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <20210521205204.GA24309@altlinux.org> <87a6ok2uxx.fsf@linux.ibm.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 27.2 From: Matheus Castanho To: Matheus Castanho Subject: Re: Linux powerpc new system call instruction and ABI In-reply-to: <87a6ok2uxx.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:33:24 -0300 Message-ID: <87im3727or.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ER5I-gxskURqA0q20yF-IAm9RBLnInl_ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: eAxo70sIvYvIrIANrjlNpsJk6RtF1TSC X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-24_09:2021-05-24, 2021-05-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105240118 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Florian Weimer , Matheus Castanho via Libc-alpha , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, musl@lists.openwall.com, Nicholas Piggin , "Dmitry V. Levin" , libc-dev@lists.llvm.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Matheus Castanho writes: > Dmitry V. Levin writes: > >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:00:36PM -0300, Matheus Castanho wrote: >>> Florian Weimer writes: >>> > * Matheus Castanho via Libc-alpha: >>> >> From: Nicholas Piggin >>> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Fix handling of scv return error codes >>> >> >>> >> When using scv on templated ASM syscalls, current code interprets any >>> >> negative return value as error, but the only valid error codes are in >>> >> the range -4095..-1 according to the ABI. >>> >> >>> >> Reviewed-by: Matheus Castanho >>> > >>> > Please reference bug 27892 in the commit message. I'd also appreciate a >>> > backport to the 2.33 release branch (where you need to add NEWS manually >>> > to add the bug reference). >>> >>> No problem. [BZ #27892] appended to the commit title. I'll make sure to >>> backport to 2.33 as well. >> >> Could you also mention in the commit message that the change fixes >> 'signal.gen.test' strace test where it was observed initially? > > Sure, no problem. I'll commit it later today. Since the patch falls into the less-than-15-LOC category and this is Nick's first contribution to glibc, looks like he doesn't need a copyright assignment. Pushed to master as 7de36744ee1325f35d3fe0ca079dd33c40b12267 Backported to 2.33 via commit 0ef0e6de7fdfa18328b09ba2afb4f0112d4bdab4 Thanks, Matheus Castanho