From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imd5h5kb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6862421a-5a14-2e38-b825-e39e6ad3d51d@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/08/2020 à 13:17, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>> On 07/16/2020 02:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>>>> The VDSO datapage and the text pages are always located immediately
>>>> next to each other, so it can be hardcoded without an indirection
>>>> through __kernel_datapage_offset
>>>>
>>>> In order to ease things, move the data page in front like other
>>>> arches, that way there is no need to know the size of the library
>>>> to locate the data page.
>>>>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> I merged this but then realised it breaks the display of the vdso in
>>> /proc/self/maps.
>>>
>>> ie. the vdso vma gets no name:
>>>
>>> # cat /proc/self/maps
>
> [...]
>
>>> And it's also going to break the logic in arch_unmap() to detect if
>>> we're unmapping (part of) the VDSO. And it will break arch_remap() too.
>>>
>>> And the logic to recognise the signal trampoline in
>>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_*.c as well.
>>
>> I don't think it breaks that one, because ->vdsobase is still the start
>> of text.
>>
>>>
>>> So I'm going to rebase and drop this for now.
>>>
>>> Basically we have a bunch of places that assume that vdso_base is == the
>>> start of the VDSO vma, and also that the code starts there. So that will
>>> need some work to tease out all those assumptions and make them work
>>> with this change.
>>
>> Ok, one day I need to look at it in more details and see how other
>> architectures handle it etc ...
>>
>
> I just sent out a series which switches powerpc to the new
> _install_special_mapping() API, the one powerpc uses being deprecated
> since commit a62c34bd2a8a ("x86, mm: Improve _install_special_mapping
> and fix x86 vdso naming")
>
> arch_remap() gets replaced by vdso_remap()
>
> For arch_unmap(), I'm wondering how/what other architectures do, because
> powerpc seems to be the only one to erase the vdso context pointer when
> unmapping the vdso.
Yeah. The original unmap/remap stuff was added for CRIU, which I thought
people tested on other architectures (more than powerpc even).
Possibly no one really cares about vdso unmap though, vs just moving the
vdso.
We added a test for vdso unmap recently because it happened to trigger a
KAUP failure, and someone actually hit it & reported it.
Running that test on arm64 segfaults:
# ./sigreturn_vdso
VDSO is at 0xffff8191f000-0xffff8191ffff (4096 bytes)
Signal delivered OK with VDSO mapped
VDSO moved to 0xffff8191a000-0xffff8191afff (4096 bytes)
Signal delivered OK with VDSO moved
Unmapped VDSO
Remapped the stack executable
[ 48.556191] potentially unexpected fatal signal 11.
[ 48.556752] CPU: 0 PID: 140 Comm: sigreturn_vdso Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2-00057-g2ac69819ba9e #190
[ 48.556990] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 48.557336] pstate: 60001000 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
[ 48.557475] pc : 0000ffff8191a7bc
[ 48.557603] lr : 0000ffff8191a7bc
[ 48.557697] sp : 0000ffffc13c9e90
[ 48.557873] x29: 0000ffffc13cb0e0 x28: 0000000000000000
[ 48.558201] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[ 48.558337] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 48.558754] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
[ 48.558893] x21: 00000000004009b0 x20: 0000000000000000
[ 48.559046] x19: 0000000000400ff0 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 48.559180] x17: 0000ffff817da300 x16: 0000000000412010
[ 48.559312] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000001c
[ 48.559443] x13: 656c626174756365 x12: 7865206b63617473
[ 48.559625] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0101010101010101
[ 48.559828] x9 : 0000ffff818afda8 x8 : 0000000000000081
[ 48.559973] x7 : 6174732065687420 x6 : 64657070616d6552
[ 48.560115] x5 : 000000000e0388bd x4 : 000000000040135d
[ 48.560270] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001
[ 48.560412] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000004120b8
Segmentation fault
#
So I think we need to keep the unmap hook. Maybe it should be handled by
the special_mapping stuff generically.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 13:16 [PATCH v8 0/8] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] powerpc/vdso64: Switch from __get_datapage() to get_datapage inline macro Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2020-07-16 2:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-04 11:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-25 14:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-26 13:58 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-08-27 20:34 ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-08-28 2:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-21 11:26 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-27 7:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-28 15:08 ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-10-23 11:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 11:25 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-23 11:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 13:29 ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove unused \tmp param in __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] powerpc/processor: Move cpu_relax() into asm/vdso/processor.h Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] powerpc/vdso: Prepare for switching VDSO to generic C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-07-15 1:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-15 18:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-16 23:18 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-08-04 11:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-05 6:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-05 13:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-06 2:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-06 18:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-07 2:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] powerpc/vdso: Switch " Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] lib/vdso: force inlining of __cvdso_clock_gettime_common() Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] powerpc/vdso: Provide __kernel_clock_gettime64() on vdso32 Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 15:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 16:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-09 15:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-09 18:48 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-29 18:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-06-03 10:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-16 12:55 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imd5h5kb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).