From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: cheloha@linux.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
ldufour@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] powerpc/pseries: update device tree before ejecting hotplug uevents
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:27:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imee1hvt.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595382730-10565-2-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com>
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> writes:
> A bug is observed on pseries by taking the following steps on rhel:
> -1. drmgr -c mem -r -q 5
> -2. echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> And then, the failure looks like:
> kdump: saving to /sysroot//var/crash/127.0.0.1-2020-01-16-02:06:14/
> kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt
> kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt complete
> kdump: saving vmcore
> Checking for memory holes : [ 0.0 %] / Checking for memory holes : [100.0 %] | Excluding unnecessary pages : [100.0 %] \ Copying data : [ 0.3 %] - eta: 38s[ 44.337636] hash-mmu: mm: Hashing failure ! EA=0x7fffba400000 access=0x8000000000000004 current=makedumpfile
> [ 44.337663] hash-mmu: trap=0x300 vsid=0x13a109c ssize=1 base psize=2 psize 2 pte=0xc000000050000504
> [ 44.337677] hash-mmu: mm: Hashing failure ! EA=0x7fffba400000 access=0x8000000000000004 current=makedumpfile
> [ 44.337692] hash-mmu: trap=0x300 vsid=0x13a109c ssize=1 base psize=2 psize 2 pte=0xc000000050000504
> [ 44.337708] makedumpfile[469]: unhandled signal 7 at 00007fffba400000 nip 00007fffbbc4d7fc lr 000000011356ca3c code 2
> [ 44.338548] Core dump to |/bin/false pipe failed
> /lib/kdump-lib-initramfs.sh: line 98: 469 Bus error $CORE_COLLECTOR /proc/vmcore $_mp/$KDUMP_PATH/$HOST_IP-$DATEDIR/vmcore-incomplete
> kdump: saving vmcore failed
>
> * Root cause *
> After analyzing, it turns out that in the current implementation,
> when hot-removing lmb, the KOBJ_REMOVE event ejects before the dt updating as
> the code __remove_memory() comes before drmem_update_dt().
> So in kdump kernel, when read_from_oldmem() resorts to
> pSeries_lpar_hpte_insert() to install hpte, but fails with -2 due to
> non-exist pfn. And finally, low_hash_fault() raise SIGBUS to process, as it
> can be observed "Bus error"
>
> From a viewpoint of listener and publisher, the publisher notifies the
> listener before data is ready. This introduces a problem where udev
> launches kexec-tools (due to KOBJ_REMOVE) and loads a stale dt before
> updating. And in capture kernel, makedumpfile will access the memory based
> on the stale dt info, and hit a SIGBUS error due to an un-existed lmb.
>
> * Fix *
> In order to fix this issue, update dt before __remove_memory(), and
> accordingly the same rule in hot-add path.
>
> This will introduce extra dt updating payload for each involved lmb when hotplug.
> But it should be fine since drmem_update_dt() is memory based operation and
> hotplug is not a hot path.
This is great analysis but the performance implications of the change
are grave. The add/remove paths here are already O(n) where n is the
quantity of memory assigned to the LP, this change would make it O(n^2):
dlpar_memory_add_by_count
for_each_drmem_lmb <--
dlpar_add_lmb
drmem_update_dt(_v1|_v2)
for_each_drmem_lmb <--
Memory add/remove isn't a hot path but quadratic runtime complexity
isn't acceptable. Its current performance is bad enough that I have
internal bugs open on it.
Not to mention we leak memory every time drmem_update_dt is called
because we can't safely free device tree properties :-(
Also note that this sort of reverts (fixes?) 063b8b1251fd
("powerpc/pseries/memory-hotplug: Only update DT once per memory DLPAR
request").
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 1:52 [PATCHv3 1/2] powerpc/pseries: group lmb operation and memblock's Pingfan Liu
2020-07-22 1:52 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] powerpc/pseries: update device tree before ejecting hotplug uevents Pingfan Liu
2020-07-22 4:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-23 2:27 ` Pingfan Liu
2020-07-23 6:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-23 13:27 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2020-07-24 12:24 ` Pingfan Liu
2020-07-24 16:50 ` Nathan Lynch
2020-07-23 14:41 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] powerpc/pseries: group lmb operation and memblock's Nathan Lynch
2020-07-28 6:39 ` Pingfan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imee1hvt.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).