From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Recompute hash value after a failed update
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:29:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87io7adwco.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442388468.7205.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 11:27 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 08:53 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> >> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > If we had secondary hash flag set, we ended up modifying hash value in
>> >> > the updatepp code path. Hence with a failed updatepp we will be using
>> >> > a wrong hash value for the following hash insert. Fix this by
>> >> > recomputing hash before insert.
>> >>
>> >> Without this patch we can end up with using wrong slot number in linux
>> >> pte. That can result in us missing an hash pte update or invalidate
>> >> which can cause memory corruption or even machine check ?
>> >
>> > Thanks. When did this break? Always? If so this should go to stable?
>> >
>>
>> IIUC we have this issue with initial support for THP (6d492ecc6489113968ec269be1cf88942d4a5d29)
>> " powerpc/THP: Add code to handle HPTE faults for hugepages". So yes
>> this should got to stable.
>
> Thanks. And that went into 3.11.
>
> You haven't actually seen any crashes that are definitely linked to this though
> am I right? You just found it by code inspection?
>
I am still not sure, why we haven't seen crashes. One of the possibility
is that we removed that slot because we ran out of free space soon
enough and everything went back normal.
Yes I found this by code inspection.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 7:00 [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Recompute hash value after a failed update Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-09-16 3:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-09-16 4:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-16 5:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-09-16 7:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-16 18:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2015-09-16 4:56 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-09-17 5:13 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87io7adwco.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).