From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org,
gautam@linux.ibm.com, Gregory Joyce <gjoyce@ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] powerpc: per device MSI irq domain
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2025 15:38:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jyyzisjj.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f82d1224-509f-446c-8dee-13e28429b52b@linux.ibm.com>
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Yes you can find the architecture document here:
> https://github.com/linuxppc/public-docs/blob/main/LoPAPR/LoPAR-20200812.pdf
>
> You may refer section 7 in the above document, which describes RTAS API.
Thank you, that helped a lot.
Can you please confirm that the below diff fixes the problem? It brings
back the "fallback" thing that you mentioned.
Best regards,
Nam
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
index a82aaa786e9e..8898a968a59b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
#include "pseries.h"
+struct pseries_msi_device {
+ unsigned int msi_quota;
+ unsigned int msi_used;
+};
+
static int query_token, change_token;
#define RTAS_QUERY_FN 0
@@ -433,8 +438,26 @@ static int pseries_msi_ops_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev
struct msi_domain_info *info = domain->host_data;
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
int type = (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX) ? PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX : PCI_CAP_ID_MSI;
+ int ret;
+
+ struct pseries_msi_device *pseries_dev __free(kfree)
+ = kmalloc(sizeof(*pseries_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pseries_dev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = rtas_prepare_msi_irqs(pdev, nvec, type, arg);
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ nvec = ret;
+ ret = rtas_prepare_msi_irqs(pdev, nvec, type, arg);
+ }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- return rtas_prepare_msi_irqs(pdev, nvec, type, arg);
+ pseries_dev->msi_quota = nvec;
+ pseries_dev->msi_used = 0;
+
+ arg->scratchpad[0].ptr = no_free_ptr(pseries_dev);
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -443,9 +466,13 @@ static int pseries_msi_ops_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev
*/
static void pseries_msi_ops_teardown(struct irq_domain *domain, msi_alloc_info_t *arg)
{
+ struct pseries_msi_device *pseries_dev = arg->scratchpad[0].ptr;
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(domain->dev);
rtas_disable_msi(pdev);
+
+ WARN_ON(pseries_dev->msi_used);
+ kfree(pseries_dev);
}
static void pseries_msi_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -546,12 +573,18 @@ static int pseries_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
{
struct pci_controller *phb = domain->host_data;
+ struct pseries_msi_device *pseries_dev;
msi_alloc_info_t *info = arg;
struct msi_desc *desc = info->desc;
struct pci_dev *pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(desc);
int hwirq;
int i, ret;
+ pseries_dev = info->scratchpad[0].ptr;
+
+ if (pseries_dev->msi_used + nr_irqs > pseries_dev->msi_quota)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
hwirq = rtas_query_irq_number(pci_get_pdn(pdev), desc->msi_index);
if (hwirq < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to query HW IRQ: %d\n", hwirq);
@@ -567,9 +600,10 @@ static int pseries_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
goto out;
irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
- &pseries_msi_irq_chip, domain->host_data);
+ &pseries_msi_irq_chip, pseries_dev);
}
+ pseries_dev->msi_used++;
return 0;
out:
@@ -582,9 +616,11 @@ static void pseries_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
unsigned int nr_irqs)
{
struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
- struct pci_controller *phb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct pseries_msi_device *pseries_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct pci_controller *phb = domain->host_data;
pr_debug("%s bridge %pOF %d #%d\n", __func__, phb->dn, virq, nr_irqs);
+ pseries_dev->msi_used -= nr_irqs;
irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-06 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 11:17 [bug report] powerpc: per device MSI irq domain Nilay Shroff
2025-12-04 10:48 ` Nam Cao
2025-12-04 17:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-12-06 14:38 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2025-12-08 12:03 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jyyzisjj.fsf@yellow.woof \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).