Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c: In function 'text_area_cpu_up_mm':
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c:157:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_init_mm' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   157 |         mm = copy_init_mm();
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
>   107b6828a7cd ("x86/mm: Use mm_alloc() in poking_init()")
>
> interacting with commit
>
>   55a02e6ea958 ("powerpc/code-patching: Use temporary mm for Radix MMU")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I partially reverted commit 107b6828a7cd - I left the change to
> arch/x86/mm/init.c applied.  Though, I wonder if the powerpc tree should
> use mm_alloc() instead of copy_init_mm() as well?  The tip tree commit
> says:
>
>     Instead of duplicating init_mm, allocate a fresh mm. The advantage is
>     that mm_alloc() has much simpler dependencies. Additionally it makes
>     more conceptual sense, init_mm has no (and must not have) user state
>     to duplicate.

I needed to rebase my next anyway, so I've squashed in a change to use
mm_alloc() in the powerpc commit. So this issue will be gone on Monday.

cheers