From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3stTg15wCgzDskf for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:50:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3stTg11Nllz9sC7 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:50:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u9B7n85q075853 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:50:02 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 260k0345qn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:50:02 -0400 Received: from localhost by e37.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:50:02 -0600 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: Michael Ellerman , "Oliver O'Halloran" Cc: Balbir Singh , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Chris Smart Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "ibm,processor-radix-AP-encodings" In-Reply-To: <87fuo35tdl.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <0612c46e-7e1b-3729-d84f-cefa886abb6d@gmail.com> <877f9wbv6j.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87fuo35tdl.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:19:53 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <87lgxvb9zy.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Michael Ellerman writes: > Oliver O'Halloran writes: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V >> wrote: >>> Balbir Singh writes: >>> >>>> The top 3 bits of the lower order byte should contain the >>>> AP encoding, we assume the top 3 bits of the MSB. >> >> Balbir, could you reword this so it says "Currently we wrongly assume >> " or similar. The current commit message made me think you were >> changing it to look at the top 3 bits of the MSB rather than changing >> it look at the LSB. > > Yeah please reword it to describe what the current code does, why it's > incorrect, and how we are fixing it. > I have an updated patch for this, which redo the AP-encoding parsing based on spec update. Wil send it to the list once we finalize the details -aneesh