From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IrDA-patched binaries
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111012312360.888-100000@auryn.jones.dk>
	<87y9lc6h13.fsf@openinformatics.com> <3BEF9DA6.14AF8E49@iiic.ethz.ch>
	<87vggg2bbu.fsf@openinformatics.com> <3BF0355D.6512A283@iiic.ethz.ch>
From: jason@openinformatics.com (Jason E. Stewart)
Date: 12 Nov 2001 14:16:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3BF0355D.6512A283@iiic.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <87lmhbg05b.fsf@openinformatics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


"Michel Dänzer" <michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch> writes:

> > > Yup, 2.4.15-pre2 has my better fix. :)
> >
> > sorry Michel, I don't understand. Is the irda_pv_t listed above your
> > fix?
>
> Yes, it's in Linus' 2.4.15-pre2 and thus of course also in Ben's.

Ah.. Thanks. So I assume that I can use BenH's kernel as is with my
Pismo and my Palm, with no patch needed?

Thanks,
jas.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/