linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] powerpc/mm: fix _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY breaking swapoff
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:13:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvscu0ve.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1601091651130.9808@eggly.anvils>

Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> writes:

> Swapoff after swapping hangs on the G5, when CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=y
> but CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is not set.  That's because the non-zero
> _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit, added by CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY=y, is not
> discounted when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is not set: so swap ptes cannot be
> recognized.
>
> (I suspect that the peculiar dependence of HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY on
> CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in arch/powerpc/Kconfig comes from an incomplete
> attempt to solve this problem.)
>
> It's true that the relationship between CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY and
> and CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is too confusing, and it's true that swapoff
> should be made more robust; but nevertheless, fix up the powerpc ifdefs
> as x86_64 and s390 (which met the same problem) have them, defining the
> bits as 0 if CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is not set.

Do we need this patch, if we make the maybe_same_pte() more robust. The
#ifdef with pte bits is always a confusing one and IMHO, we should avoid
that if we can ?

>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
>
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h    |    5 +++++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h |    9 ++++++---
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- 4.4-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h	2016-01-06 11:54:01.377508976 -0800
> +++ linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h	2016-01-09 13:54:24.410893347 -0800
> @@ -33,7 +33,12 @@
>  #define _PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT	12
>  #define _PAGE_F_SECOND		0x08000 /* Whether to use secondary hash or not */
>  #define _PAGE_SPECIAL		0x10000 /* software: special page */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
>  #define _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY	0x20000 /* software: software dirty tracking */
> +#else
> +#define _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY	0x00000
> +#endif
>
>  /*
>   * We need to differentiate between explicit huge page and THP huge
> --- 4.4-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h	2016-01-06 11:54:01.377508976 -0800
> +++ linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h	2016-01-09 13:54:24.410893347 -0800
> @@ -162,8 +162,13 @@ static inline void pgd_set(pgd_t *pgdp,
>  #define __pte_to_swp_entry(pte)		((swp_entry_t) { pte_val((pte)) })
>  #define __swp_entry_to_pte(x)		__pte((x).val)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
>  #define _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY   (1UL << (SWP_TYPE_BITS + _PAGE_BIT_SWAP_TYPE))
> +#else
> +#define _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY	0UL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY
>  static inline pte_t pte_swp_mksoft_dirty(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return __pte(pte_val(pte) | _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY);
> @@ -176,8 +181,6 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_soft_d
>  {
>  	return __pte(pte_val(pte) & ~_PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY);
>  }
> -#else
> -#define _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY	0
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY */
>
>  void pgtable_cache_add(unsigned shift, void (*ctor)(void *));

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-10  0:54 [PATCH next] powerpc/mm: fix _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY breaking swapoff Hugh Dickins
2016-01-10  0:59 ` [PATCH next] mm: make swapoff more robust against soft dirty Hugh Dickins
2016-01-10 14:09   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-01-11  5:39   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-01-10 14:07 ` [PATCH next] powerpc/mm: fix _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY breaking swapoff Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-01-11  5:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2016-01-11  6:05   ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-11  6:31     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-01-11  7:33       ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-11 16:04 ` Laurent Dufour
2016-01-12 12:32 ` [next] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mvscu0ve.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).