LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
	Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 09:16:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pl28z3nx.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522152744.55251-3-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Amit,

Thanks for this patch. Few review comments below:

Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Introduce a new capability and ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes
> supported by the host processor for nested guests.
>
> On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations (N) can operate in
> compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations, like (N-1) and
> (N-2). This is particularly relevant for nested virtualization, where
> nested KVM guests may need to run with a specific processor compatibility
> level.
>
> Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the corresponding
> KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS vm ioctl. The ioctl returns a bitmap describing
> the compatibility modes supported by the host in respective bit numbers,
> allowing userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select an appropriate compatibility
> level when configuring nested KVM guests.
>
> The ioctl handling is added in kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() and retrieves host
> CPU compatibility capabilities via a PowerPC-specific backend
> implementation when available. If the capability is not supported, the
> ioctl returns success with no capabilities set, allowing userspace to
> fall back gracefully.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h  |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c          | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h            |  4 ++++
>  4 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index 0953f2daa466..cadfb839e836 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops {
>  	bool (*hash_v3_possible)(void);
>  	int (*create_vm_debugfs)(struct kvm *kvm);
>  	int (*create_vcpu_debugfs)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct dentry *debugfs_dentry);
> +	int (*get_compat_cpu_ver)(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps);
>  };
>  
>  extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 077c5437f521..081d6c7f7f70 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -437,6 +437,12 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>  	__u64	behaviour_mask;		/* valid bits in behaviour */
>  };
>  
> +/* For KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS */
> +struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
> +	__u64	flags;			/* Reserved for future use */
Please introduce a size field also for the UAPI so that in this
structure can evolve in future without breaking kernel ABI.

> +	__u64	compat_capabilities;	/* Capabilities supported by the host */
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * Values for character and character_mask.
>   * These are identical to the values used by H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 00302399fc37..02b834ebd8d3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -697,6 +697,13 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  			}
>  		}
>  		break;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE)
> +	case KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS:
> +		r = 0;
> +		if (kvmhv_on_pseries())
> +			r = 1;
> +		break;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE */
>  	default:
>  		r = 0;
>  		break;
> @@ -2463,6 +2470,20 @@ int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>  		r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->svm_off(kvm);
>  		break;
>  	}
> +	case KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS: {
> +		struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps host_caps;
> +
> +		r = -ENOTTY;
> +		memset(&host_caps, 0, sizeof(host_caps));
> +		if (!kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_cpu_ver)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_cpu_ver(&host_caps);
> +		if (!r && copy_to_user(argp, &host_caps,
> +				     sizeof(host_caps)))
As mentioned above please introduce a size field in the structure thats
being copied to the userspace and use the size field to copy the
apporiate structure to the userspace. Otherwise a future kernel may
unintentionally overwrite unintended userspace memory if it happens to
be using a  larger structure size then what VMM knows about.

> +			r = -EFAULT;
> +		break;
> +	}
>  	default: {
>  		struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data;
>  		r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 6c8afa2047bf..1788a0068662 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -996,6 +996,7 @@ struct kvm_enable_cap {
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_OPEREXEC 246
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_KEYOP 247
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_VSIE_ESAMODE 248
> +#define KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS 249
>  
>  struct kvm_irq_routing_irqchip {
>  	__u32 irqchip;
> @@ -1349,6 +1350,9 @@ struct kvm_s390_keyop {
>  #define KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR	  _IOW(KVMIO,  0xe2, struct kvm_device_attr)
>  #define KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR	  _IOW(KVMIO,  0xe3, struct kvm_device_attr)
>  
> +/* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS */
> +#define KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS	_IOR(KVMIO,  0xe4, struct
> kvm_ppc_compat_caps)
Minor: you may want to align the name of the newly introduced kvmppc_ops
to KVM CAP you are introducing here.

> +
>  /*
>   * ioctls for vcpu fds
>   */
> -- 
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
>

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22 15:27 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: PPC: Handle CPU compatibility mode for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-22 15:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-28  3:13   ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-29 10:28     ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-29 11:53       ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-03  3:33         ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-06-03  4:33           ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2026-06-03  5:10             ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-06-03  6:05               ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-03  6:31                 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-06-03 14:26                 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-22 15:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-03  3:46   ` Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2026-05-22 15:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-03  4:01   ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-05-22 15:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-03  4:17   ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-05-22 15:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pl28z3nx.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com \
    --to=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox