From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [0/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Adjustments for two function implementations
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:11:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plupbm0c.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee6022b8-3aeb-4e6e-99f5-2668dd344e0a@web.de>
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> writes:
>> A few update suggestions were taken into account
>> from static source code analysis.
>>
>> Markus Elfring (2):
>
> I would appreciate a bit more information about the reasons
> why this patch series was rejected.
>
>
>> One function call less in vas_window_alloc() after error detection
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/1f1c21cf-c34c-418c-b00c-8e6474f12612@web.de/
It introduced a new goto and label to avoid a kfree(NULL) call, but
kfree() explicitly accepts NULL and handles it. So it complicates the
source code for no gain.
>> Return directly after a failed kasprintf() in map_paste_region()
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/f46f04bc-613c-4e98-b602-4c5120556b09@web.de/
Basically the same reasoning. And it also changes the function from
having two return paths (success and error), to three.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-23 19:15 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Adjustments for two function implementations Markus Elfring
2023-12-23 19:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: One function call less in vas_window_alloc() after error detection Markus Elfring
2023-12-23 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Return directly after a failed kasprintf() in map_paste_region() Markus Elfring
2024-04-15 7:42 ` [0/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Adjustments for two function implementations Markus Elfring
2024-04-16 11:11 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-04-16 11:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-16 12:14 ` Markus Elfring
2024-04-16 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-16 12:56 ` Julia Lawall
2024-04-16 13:05 ` Markus Elfring
2024-04-16 14:05 ` [0/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Adjustments for map_paste_region()? Markus Elfring
2024-04-16 12:04 ` [0/2] powerpc/powernv/vas: Adjustments for two function implementations Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plupbm0c.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).