linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:19:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppnc0wn1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com>

Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:

> On 14-01-28 12:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Commit b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f ("powerpc/thp: Fix
>>> crash on mremap") added a "typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;"
>>> which on gcc 4.5.2 (and possibly other versions) causes many of:
>>>
>>> include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563:25: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
>>> In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:15:0,
>>>                  from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
>>>                  from include/linux/pm_qos.h:8,
>>>                  from include/linux/netdevice.h:28,
>>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h:20,
>>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debug.c:17:
>>>
>>> It appears that somewhere between gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.3 this
>>> redefinition restriction was lifted.  Using the proper header
>>> from within !ASSEMBLY seems to fix it up in an acceptable way.
>>>
>>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> http://mid.gmane.org/1389939036.3000.7.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com
>> 
>> This was posted earlier.
>
> I see.  Well I guess Ben didn't use it since it is the same as the
> temporary not-signed-off-by hack patch I posted earlier as well.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/584
>
> I believe what I've posted here below to be the proper fix.

I had another variant which needed this

http://mid.gmane.org/1388999012-14424-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com

BTW I had added the above struct spinlock; patch as the backport to
stable 3.13 series. So if we are picking another one, we may need to
update stable also

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-28 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-28 16:16 [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 17:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 17:49   ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 18:49     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2014-01-28 19:07       ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ppnc0wn1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).