linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	 Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,  Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,  sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
	 Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:16:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87qzud42n1.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029100909.3381140-2-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>

Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> writes:

> From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Since commit b9ef323ea168 ("powerpc/64s: Disable preemption in hash
> lazy mmu mode") a task can not be preempted while in lazy MMU mode.
> Therefore, the batch re-activation code is never called, so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h |  2 --
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c          | 25 -------------------------
>  2 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
>

Since the commit referenced in above disables the preemption in
arch_enter_lazy_mmu(), so the expectation is that we will never be
context switched while in lazy_mmu, hence the code changes in
switch_to() around __flush_tlb_pending() should ideally never be called.

With this analysis - the patch looks good to me. I will give this entire
patch series a try on Power HW with Hash mmu too (which uses lazy mmu and
let you know the results of that)!

For this patch please feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>


CC: Venkat who also runs CI on linux Power HW for upstream testing :)

-ritesh


> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index b0f200aba2b3..97f35f9b1a96 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -154,12 +154,10 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>  /* Don't move TLF_NAPPING without adjusting the code in entry_32.S */
>  #define TLF_NAPPING		0	/* idle thread enabled NAP mode */
>  #define TLF_SLEEPING		1	/* suspend code enabled SLEEP mode */
> -#define TLF_LAZY_MMU		3	/* tlb_batch is active */
>  #define TLF_RUNLATCH		4	/* Is the runlatch enabled? */
>  
>  #define _TLF_NAPPING		(1 << TLF_NAPPING)
>  #define _TLF_SLEEPING		(1 << TLF_SLEEPING)
> -#define _TLF_LAZY_MMU		(1 << TLF_LAZY_MMU)
>  #define _TLF_RUNLATCH		(1 << TLF_RUNLATCH)
>  
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index eb23966ac0a9..9237dcbeee4a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1281,9 +1281,6 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>  {
>  	struct thread_struct *new_thread, *old_thread;
>  	struct task_struct *last;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
> -	struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> -#endif
>  
>  	new_thread = &new->thread;
>  	old_thread = &current->thread;
> @@ -1291,14 +1288,6 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>  	WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
> -	batch = this_cpu_ptr(&ppc64_tlb_batch);
> -	if (batch->active) {
> -		current_thread_info()->local_flags |= _TLF_LAZY_MMU;
> -		if (batch->index)
> -			__flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> -		batch->active = 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * On POWER9 the copy-paste buffer can only paste into
>  	 * foreign real addresses, so unprivileged processes can not
> @@ -1369,20 +1358,6 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>  	 */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
> -	/*
> -	 * This applies to a process that was context switched while inside
> -	 * arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(), to re-activate the batch that was
> -	 * deactivated above, before _switch(). This will never be the case
> -	 * for new tasks.
> -	 */
> -	if (current_thread_info()->local_flags & _TLF_LAZY_MMU) {
> -		current_thread_info()->local_flags &= ~_TLF_LAZY_MMU;
> -		batch = this_cpu_ptr(&ppc64_tlb_batch);
> -		batch->active = 1;
> -	}
> -#endif
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Math facilities are masked out of the child MSR in copy_thread.
>  	 * A new task does not need to restore_math because it will
> -- 
> 2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-29 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/12] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05  2:46   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-11-06 10:29     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-08  0:35       ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-10 13:18         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 12:25   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 12:28     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:06     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 12:31   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:36     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 10:08       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 15:45   ` Jürgen Groß
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05  3:15   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-05  9:49     ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:31       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:16   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05  4:40   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:33     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 13:56   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:37     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-07 14:26   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 14:34     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-07 15:22       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10  8:11         ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-10  9:19           ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-11  8:01             ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-11 12:16               ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:45     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 12:47       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 16:41   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-10-30 10:28     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-30 16:34       ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-01 12:22   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:08     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05  8:49   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-05 16:12     ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-06 10:51       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 15:33         ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-07 10:16           ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 16:32       ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 17:01         ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-07 11:13         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 14:59   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:47     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 10:24       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-11 15:56         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 17:03           ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-12 10:42             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-12 13:57               ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:25     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:28   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-04 11:33     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05  9:40   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:11   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:15   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-03 18:29     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 19:23       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-04 11:28         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:42   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:48     ` Kevin Brodsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87qzud42n1.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).