From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7542CEB64D7 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=nAwkvwSO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Qlm0W5kt1z3bfH for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:19:39 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=nAwkvwSO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QllzX06swz2xwG for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:18:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QllzV5cb6z4wgq; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:18:46 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1687263527; bh=PbLHIaiJwWOuc0fVdNIxbCOnVmMY9JR8H0lS3tr/vmI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nAwkvwSO8o15o+i3GtsKc00hLs52HSnEoaQbcFsFkF565HlED4gbVyyJXdHysvEje URXuU70oSpORlG6Ce2eddBR9XMCNHphJphpVBB8NaydckPGzEPaLEJlTPlg6MdnToE CsQlA7l3gz2fvU2T9jmoPU1DYhiZeyfkaam4EUBLqifKIm2Yx8eF8xhtaSFrctw3SM fvyfN/t+hHCOMy29purWJiadWsthGc2sP1SoaV0NRf0ybGpJe86v4HzULyUCftgafr IPdBARIRDtq9P1m8rengrVYETO8o8ma6RHxj4u8CtZVVfVumpewQoUZLkuWg8hUHA2 kYK/Tz3Z54CRQ== From: Michael Ellerman To: zhumao001@208suo.com, fbarrat@linux.ibm.com, ajd@linux.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word In-Reply-To: <787f5a712a0459bc21d83bb388770b58@208suo.com> References: <20230618150648.1123-1-dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com> <787f5a712a0459bc21d83bb388770b58@208suo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:18:41 +1000 Message-ID: <87r0q6pbry.fsf@mail.lhotse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" zhumao001@208suo.com writes: > Delete repeated word in comment. > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao > --- > drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c > index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(struct > cxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr) > * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to > the > * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable. > * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction > hence > - * we dont dont need one here. > + * we dont need one here. I know the rule is to only do one change per patch, but if you're fixing the wording of a comment you can absolutely fix the spelling at the same time. So please send a v2 with "dont" spelt correctly. cheers