From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942AEC43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1789C20661 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:27:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1789C20661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47Stkc1TYrzDqWc for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:27:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nathanl@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47StgY5kyXzDqV6 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:24:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB4MIHlX124444; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:24:13 -0500 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wnqn667xx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:24:13 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xB4MJtGp029131; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:12 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2wkg27bf8v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Dec 2019 22:24:12 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB4MOBlM19071374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:11 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C329BE056; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0347FBE05A; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.41.179.251]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Nathan Lynch To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pseries: Track and expose idle PURR and SPURR ticks In-Reply-To: <1574856072-30972-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1574856072-30972-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 16:24:10 -0600 Message-ID: <87r21ju3ud.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-04_03:2019-12-04,2019-12-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=725 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912040185 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kamalesh Babulal , "Naveen N. Rao" , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > On PSeries LPARs, the data centers planners desire a more accurate > view of system utilization per resource such as CPU to plan the system > capacity requirements better. Such accuracy can be obtained by reading > PURR/SPURR registers for CPU resource utilization. > > Tools such as lparstat which are used to compute the utilization need > to know [S]PURR ticks when the cpu was busy or idle. The [S]PURR > counters are already exposed through sysfs. We already account for > PURR ticks when we go to idle so that we can update the VPA area. This > patchset extends support to account for SPURR ticks when idle, and > expose both via per-cpu sysfs files. Does anything really want to use PURR instead of SPURR? Seems like we should expose only SPURR idle values if possible.