From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Batch tlb flush when invalidating pte entries
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:38:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r36eavsp.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161114155857.25046-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> This will improve the task exit case, by batching tlb invalidates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
> index aec6e8ee6e27..e8b4f39e9fab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
> @@ -147,10 +147,16 @@ static inline unsigned long radix__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * new value of pte
> */
> new_pte = (old_pte | set) & ~clr;
> - psize = radix_get_mmu_psize(pg_sz);
> - radix__flush_tlb_page_psize(mm, addr, psize);
> -
> - __radix_pte_update(ptep, 0, new_pte);
> + /*
> + * If we are trying to clear the pte, we can skip
> + * the below sequence and batch the tlb flush. The
> + * tlb flush batching is done by mmu gather code
> + */
> + if (new_pte) {
> + psize = radix_get_mmu_psize(pg_sz);
> + radix__flush_tlb_page_psize(mm, addr, psize);
> + __radix_pte_update(ptep, 0, new_pte);
> + }
> } else
> old_pte = __radix_pte_update(ptep, clr, set);
> asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
We can also avoid the ptesync I guess. BTW for transition from V=0 to
a valid pte, we are good without this patch because that is done via set_pte_at()
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
index e8b4f39e9fab..83c77323a769 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
@@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ static inline unsigned long radix__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long new_pte;
old_pte = __radix_pte_update(ptep, ~0, 0);
- asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
/*
* new value of pte
*/
@@ -153,6 +152,7 @@ static inline unsigned long radix__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
* tlb flush batching is done by mmu gather code
*/
if (new_pte) {
+ asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
psize = radix_get_mmu_psize(pg_sz);
radix__flush_tlb_page_psize(mm, addr, psize);
__radix_pte_update(ptep, 0, new_pte);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 15:58 [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Batch tlb flush when invalidating pte entries Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-11-14 16:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r36eavsp.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).