From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6FD12C0087 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 23:49:38 +1000 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: windfarm_fcu_controls: cpu-pump-0 References: <87r4eb52s6.fsf@igel.home> <1375481448.15999.47.camel__48019.1930350431$1375481501$gmane$org@pasglop> <1375519493.15999.83.camel__49452.0221990117$1375519543$gmane$org@pasglop> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 15:49:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1375519493.15999.83.camel__49452.0221990117$1375519543$gmane$org@pasglop> (Benjamin Herrenschmidt's message of "Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:44:53 +1000") Message-ID: <87r4eahoka.fsf@igel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Actually I see the same failure mask with the therm_pm72 driver, I didn't notice since the driver ignores the return value from set_rpm_fan and there is no sysfs file to monitor the cpu pumps. So it looks like some real hardware fault? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."