linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pseries/mobility: Set NMI watchdog factor during LPM
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:28:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfnvmgql.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614135414.37746-5-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>

Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> index 179bbd4ae881..4284ceaf9060 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,39 @@ struct update_props_workarea {
>  #define MIGRATION_SCOPE	(1)
>  #define PRRN_SCOPE -2
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG
> +static unsigned int lpm_nmi_wd_factor = 200;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> +static struct ctl_table lpm_nmi_wd_factor_ctl_table[] = {
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "lpm_nmi_watchdog_factor",

Assuming the basic idea is acceptable, I suggest making the user-visible
name more generic (e.g. "nmi_watchdog_factor") in case it makes sense to
apply this to other contexts in the future.

> +		.data		= &lpm_nmi_wd_factor,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_douintvec_minmax,
> +	},
> +	{}
> +};
> +static struct ctl_table lpm_nmi_wd_factor_sysctl_root[] = {
> +	{
> +		.procname       = "kernel",
> +		.mode           = 0555,
> +		.child          = lpm_nmi_wd_factor_ctl_table,
> +	},
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static int __init register_lpm_nmi_wd_factor_sysctl(void)
> +{
> +	register_sysctl_table(lpm_nmi_wd_factor_sysctl_root);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(register_lpm_nmi_wd_factor_sysctl);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG */
> +
>  static int mobility_rtas_call(int token, char *buf, s32 scope)
>  {
>  	int rc;
> @@ -702,6 +735,7 @@ static int pseries_suspend(u64 handle)
>  static int pseries_migrate_partition(u64 handle)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> +	unsigned int factor = lpm_nmi_wd_factor;
>  
>  	ret = wait_for_vasi_session_suspending(handle);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -709,6 +743,13 @@ static int pseries_migrate_partition(u64 handle)
>  
>  	vas_migration_handler(VAS_SUSPEND);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG
> +	if (factor) {
> +		pr_info("Set the NMI watchdog factor to %u%%\n", factor);
> +		watchdog_nmi_set_lpm_factor(factor);
> +	}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG */
> +
>  	ret = pseries_suspend(handle);
>  	if (ret == 0) {
>  		post_mobility_fixup();
> @@ -716,6 +757,13 @@ static int pseries_migrate_partition(u64 handle)
>  	} else
>  		pseries_cancel_migration(handle, ret);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG
> +	if (factor) {
> +		pr_info("Restoring NMI watchdog timer\n");
> +		watchdog_nmi_set_lpm_factor(0);
> +	}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG */
> +

A couple more suggestions:

* Move the prints into a single statement in watchdog_nmi_set_lpm_factor().

* Add no-op versions of watchdog_nmi_set_lpm_factor for
  !CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG so we can minimize the #ifdef here.

Otherwise this looks fine to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 13:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] Extending NMI watchdog during LPM Laurent Dufour
2022-06-14 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] powerpc/mobility: Wait for memory transfer to complete Laurent Dufour
2022-06-21 16:52   ` Nathan Lynch
2022-06-14 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] watchdog: export watchdog_mutex and lockup_detector_reconfigure Laurent Dufour
2022-06-24  6:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-06-24  8:27     ` Laurent Dufour
2022-06-24  9:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-24 12:45     ` Laurent Dufour
2022-06-14 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/watchdog: introduce a LPM factor Laurent Dufour
2022-06-22  9:26   ` kernel test robot
2022-06-14 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] pseries/mobility: Set NMI watchdog factor during LPM Laurent Dufour
2022-06-23 17:28   ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2022-06-24 14:09     ` Laurent Dufour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sfnvmgql.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).