From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from void.printf.net (void.printf.net [89.145.121.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C212C00A6 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:46:56 +1000 (EST) From: Chris Ball To: Haijun Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mmc:of_spi: Update the code of getting voltage-ranges References: <1376271546-25085-1-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> <1376271546-25085-3-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 00:19:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1376271546-25085-3-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> (Haijun Zhang's message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:39:05 +0800") Message-ID: <87txiepflk.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cbouatmailru@gmail.com, scottwood@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, X.Xie@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Haijun, On Sun, Aug 11 2013, Haijun Zhang wrote: > Using function mmc_of_parse_voltage() to get voltage-ranges. > > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang The patchset contains patches 1-3 of 3, and also this unnumbered patch v3. Which order should I use to apply this patch? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball