From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com
Cc: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/powerpc/kvm: Avoid extra checks when emulating HFSCR bits
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:17:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v816w2xy.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626123447.66104-1-gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> When a KVM guest tries to use a feature disabled by HFSCR, it exits to
> the host for emulation support, and the code checks for all bits which
> are emulated. Avoid checking all the bits by using a switch case.
The patch looks fine, but I don't know what you mean by "avoid checking
all the bits".
The existing code checks 4 cases, the case statement checks the same 4
cases (plus the default case).
There are other cause values (not bits), but the new and old code don't
check them all anyway. (Which is OK because the default return value is
EMULATE_FAIL)
AFAICS it generates almost identical code.
So I think the change log should just say something like "all the FSCR
cause values are exclusive so use a case statement which better
expresses that" ?
Also please try to copy the existing subject style for the KVM code, for
this file it would be "KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: ...". I agree it's verbose,
and wouldn't be my choice, but thats what's always been used so let's
stick to it.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 99c7ce825..a72fd2543 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1922,14 +1922,22 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> r = EMULATE_FAIL;
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
> - if (cause == FSCR_MSGP_LG)
> + switch (cause) {
> + case FSCR_MSGP_LG:
> r = kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr(vcpu);
> - if (cause == FSCR_PM_LG)
> + break;
> + case FSCR_PM_LG:
> r = kvmppc_pmu_unavailable(vcpu);
> - if (cause == FSCR_EBB_LG)
> + break;
> + case FSCR_EBB_LG:
> r = kvmppc_ebb_unavailable(vcpu);
> - if (cause == FSCR_TM_LG)
> + break;
> + case FSCR_TM_LG:
> r = kvmppc_tm_unavailable(vcpu);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> }
> if (r == EMULATE_FAIL) {
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL |
> --
> 2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 12:34 [PATCH] arch/powerpc/kvm: Avoid extra checks when emulating HFSCR bits Gautam Menghani
2024-07-15 5:26 ` Gautam Menghani
2024-07-16 1:17 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-07-16 10:32 ` Gautam Menghani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v816w2xy.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).