From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: add `cur_cpu_spec` symbol to vmcoreinfo
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:38:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8c3m70t.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pm2chrfh.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 05:45:36PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > Since below commit, address mapping for vmemmap has changed for Radix
>>> > MMU, where address mapping is stored in kernel page table itself,
>>> > instead of earlier used 'vmemmap_list'.
>>> >
>>> > commit 368a0590d954 ("powerpc/book3s64/vmemmap: switch radix to use
>>> > a different vmemmap handling function")
>>> >
>>> > Hence with upstream kernel, in case of Radix MMU, makedumpfile fails to do
>>> > address translation for vmemmap addresses, as it depended on vmemmap_list,
>>> > which can now be empty.
>>> >
>>> > While fixing the address translation in makedumpfile, it was identified
>>> > that currently makedumpfile cannot distinguish between Hash MMU and
>>> > Radix MMU, unless VMLINUX is passed with -x flag to makedumpfile.
>>> > And hence fails to assign offsets and shifts correctly (such as in L4 to
>>> > PGDIR offset calculation in makedumpfile).
>>> >
>>> > For getting the MMU, makedumpfile uses `cur_cpu_spec.mmu_features`.
>>> >
>>> > Add `cur_cpu_spec` symbol and offset of `mmu_features` in the
>>> > `cpu_spec` struct, to VMCOREINFO, so that makedumpfile can assign the
>>> > offsets correctly, without needing a VMLINUX.
>>> >
>>> > Fixes: 368a0590d954 ("powerpc/book3s64/vmemmap: switch radix to use a different vmemmap handling function")
>>> > Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
>>> > Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > Corresponding makedumpfile patches to fix address translation, in Radix
>>> > MMU case:
>>> >
>>> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kexec/B5F0F00E-F2B1-47D7-A143-5683D10DC29A@linux.ibm.com/T/#t
>>> > ---
>>> > ---
>>> > arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c | 2 ++
>>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>>> > index de64c7962991..369b8334a4f0 100644
>>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>>> > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
>>> > #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
>>> > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(contig_page_data);
>>> > #endif
>>> > + VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(cur_cpu_spec);
>>> > + VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(cpu_spec, mmu_features);
>>> > #if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
>>> > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(vmemmap_list);
>>> > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(mmu_vmemmap_psize);
>>> >
>>>
>>> That implies we now have to be careful when updating MMU_FTR_* #defines.
>>> It is not bad considering other hacks we do in crash to identify kernel
>>> changes tied to version number. But i am wondering if there another way
>>> to identify radix vs hash?
>>>
>>
>> I could not find another way to get any other flag for RADIX vs HASH in
>> makedumpfile. And currently I don't know of any other way.
>>
>> Both makedumpfile and crash look for '0x40' flag set in
>> 'cur_cpu_spec.mmu_features', so only requirement for 'MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX' is to
>> be '0x40', or we will need to change the value accordingly in the tools.
>
> Instead of exporting cur_cpu_spec.mmu_feature, you could do
> coreinfo_mmu_features that does
>
> if (radix_enabled())
> coreinfo_mmu_feature = VMCORE_INFO_RADIX_TRANSLATION;
On other arches they seem to use vmcoreinfo_append_str() for more things
than we do on powerpc.
eg. x86:
vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(pgtable_l5_enabled)=%d\n", pgtable_l5_enabled());
Could we do something like that instead:
vmcoreinfo_append_str("RADIX_MMU=%d\n", early_radix_enabled());
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-21 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 10:57 [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: add `cur_cpu_spec` symbol to vmcoreinfo Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: add cpu_spec.cpu_features " Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 12:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: add `cur_cpu_spec` symbol " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-09-20 14:23 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-21 8:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-09-21 23:38 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-09-21 12:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-21 10:38 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8c3m70t.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).