From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Create separate mappings for hot-plugged memory
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:01:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9ji2hw9.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623073017.1951-2-bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Memory that gets hot-plugged _during_ boot (and not the memory
> that gets plugged in after boot), is mapped with 1G mappings
> and will undergo splitting when it is unplugged. The splitting
> code has a few issues:
>
> 1. Recursive locking
> --------------------
> Memory unplug path takes cpu_hotplug_lock and calls stop_machine()
> for splitting the mappings. However stop_machine() takes
> cpu_hotplug_lock again causing deadlock.
>
> 2. BUG: sleeping function called from in_atomic() context
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Memory unplug path (remove_pagetable) takes init_mm.page_table_lock
> spinlock and later calls stop_machine() which does wait_for_completion()
>
> 3. Bad unlock unbalance
> -----------------------
> Memory unplug path takes init_mm.page_table_lock spinlock and calls
> stop_machine(). The stop_machine thread function runs in a different
> thread context (migration thread) which tries to release and reaquire
> ptl. Releasing ptl from a different thread than which acquired it
> causes bad unlock unbalance.
>
> These problems can be avoided if we avoid mapping hot-plugged memory
> with 1G mapping, thereby removing the need for splitting them during
> unplug. Hence, during radix init, identify the hot-plugged memory region
> and create separate mappings for each LMB so that they don't get mapped
> with 1G mappings. The identification of hot-plugged memory has become
> possible after the commit b6eca183e23e ("powerpc/kernel: Enables memory
> hot-remove after reboot on pseries guests").
>
> To create separate mappings for every LMB in the hot-plugged
> region, we need lmb-size for which we use memory_block_size_bytes().
> Since this is early init time code, the machine type isn't probed yet
> and hence memory_block_size_bytes() would return the default LMB size
> as 16MB. Hence we end up issuing more number of mapping requests
> than earlier.
Considering we can split 1G pages correctly, we can avoid doing this?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> index 8acb96de0e48..ffccfe00ca2a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> #include <linux/string_helpers.h>
> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> +#include <linux/memory.h>
>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> @@ -320,6 +321,8 @@ static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
> {
> unsigned long rts_field;
> struct memblock_region *reg;
> + phys_addr_t addr;
> + u64 lmb_size = memory_block_size_bytes();
>
> /* We don't support slb for radix */
> mmu_slb_size = 0;
> @@ -338,9 +341,15 @@ static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
> continue;
> }
>
> - WARN_ON(create_physical_mapping(reg->base,
> - reg->base + reg->size,
> - -1, PAGE_KERNEL));
> + if (memblock_is_hotpluggable(reg)) {
> + for (addr = reg->base; addr < (reg->base + reg->size);
> + addr += lmb_size)
> + WARN_ON(create_physical_mapping(addr,
> + addr + lmb_size, -1, PAGE_KERNEL));
> + } else
> + WARN_ON(create_physical_mapping(reg->base,
> + reg->base + reg->size,
> + -1, PAGE_KERNEL));
> }
>
> /* Find out how many PID bits are supported */
> --
> 2.21.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 7:30 [PATCH v1 0/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Memory unplug fixes Bharata B Rao
2020-06-23 7:30 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Create separate mappings for hot-plugged memory Bharata B Rao
2020-06-23 10:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-06-23 7:30 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Fix PTE/PMD fragment count for early page table mappings Bharata B Rao
2020-06-23 10:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-23 13:42 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-06-23 7:30 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Free PUD table when freeing pagetable Bharata B Rao
2020-06-23 10:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9ji2hw9.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).