From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/vm: Update max va test to check for high address return.
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:38:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vaeha656.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228035830.10089-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> mmap(-1,..) is expected to search from max supported VA top down. It should find
> an address above ADDR_SWITCH_HINT. Explicitly check for this.
>
> Also derefer the address even if we failed the addr check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
One issue I noticed is how to make this conditional so that we can still
run the test on x86 with 4 level page table?
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
> index e7fe734c374f..f68fa4bd8179 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct testcase {
> unsigned long flags;
> const char *msg;
> unsigned int low_addr_required:1;
> + unsigned int high_addr_required:1;
> unsigned int keep_mapped:1;
> };
>
> @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ static struct testcase testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR)",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> @@ -115,12 +117,14 @@ static struct testcase testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR) again",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_FIXED)",
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = (void *) -1,
> @@ -128,12 +132,14 @@ static struct testcase testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(-1)",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = (void *) -1,
> .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(-1) again",
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE)),
> @@ -193,6 +199,7 @@ static struct testcase hugetlb_testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> @@ -200,12 +207,14 @@ static struct testcase hugetlb_testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_HUGETLB) again",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_FIXED | MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = (void *) -1,
> @@ -213,12 +222,14 @@ static struct testcase hugetlb_testcases[] = {
> .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(-1, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> .keep_mapped = 1,
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = (void *) -1,
> .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> .msg = "mmap(-1, MAP_HUGETLB) again",
> + .high_addr_required = 1,
> },
> {
> .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE),
> @@ -257,14 +268,16 @@ static int run_test(struct testcase *test, int count)
> if (t->low_addr_required && p >= (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT)) {
> printf("FAILED\n");
> ret = 1;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * Do a dereference of the address returned so that we catch
> - * bugs in page fault handling
> - */
> - memset(p, 0, t->size);
> + } else if (t->high_addr_required && p < (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT)) {
> + printf("FAILED\n");
> + ret = 1;
> + } else
> printf("OK\n");
> - }
> + /*
> + * Do a dereference of the address returned so that we catch
> + * bugs in page fault handling
> + */
> + memset(p, 0, t->size);
> if (!t->keep_mapped)
> munmap(p, t->size);
> }
> --
> 2.14.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 3:58 [PATCH] selftests/vm: Update max va test to check for high address return Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-28 8:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2018-02-28 10:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vaeha656.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).