From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E508C61DB2 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bJf6k6sWYz30HB; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 22:37:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.130 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1749818238; cv=none; b=XBoLIq1eTGoUMHkPc35CA2BTfF/H0IPAdJAs6oU8+8w477zEIusKm6uZYvKlH9LEn1Uz7ga3woG02d8KCwX0UvTI1y/fyKLHLfcmMTjcZ/RI5qQd+/UpMLLPoJvmfZPmgkY+fHUxCukaxIhLsyy3pDqmg5hI78XzwJ3e6zGZnmE2AtS/3CVtzKqYEqB83ac//76QcxgEFOnKbY0LQkYnXhlX59pmudejYhY7RzWtuLLId+Bzfh52foEj192IShnOD4+jExsTbA8MmUqf5Z+9xwWxSpVxoEZoYZ1RSnqSs8yDzs4YJ92q3UZf7A1pRr9hgnW/0trYI6x80FeC1jQI5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1749818238; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=Ons9VlAWyS5iGbbTVkDBgSxgXbxKUV7OAg/2/YmOuTQ=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QQcaX0FKdxEERGVguYiRRD80Dhi8uu0fhklT42vHWD5WMG8iSMwXiPTULjvrDM1N3YwhcLh83KecNBrllFbcyqtIUoIYXJIa1nhEpNlb8QsDqdnwdCTuY8JsOkchPp0xr839lJmlcbn23Rj6zGqgaZncAMBlTxFScVUSoacCJap2QHmiXRtzMmCD+wX77n4Pusx7f8ClzUFe7ynaU3DKti0eg3ahTbnSyuV3CxDf/gct6Z/MCXUf6ZU5Bhbn27jRyumGWMvSDRq5a/lzBZ2Em/lbOrxget4N8V3xK1W2g618nTZG6ZgS7qCy3YIl3TkbvkVezShSIMVtleAHypwANA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=kCCrcdFT; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zQujh0/5; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=kCCrcdFT; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zQujh0/5; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=tiwai@suse.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=kCCrcdFT; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zQujh0/5; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=kCCrcdFT; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zQujh0/5; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=tiwai@suse.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) X-Greylist: delayed 12120 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at boromir; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 22:37:17 AEST Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bJf6j63G0z2xKN for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 22:37:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C8E21A23; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:37:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1749818234; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ons9VlAWyS5iGbbTVkDBgSxgXbxKUV7OAg/2/YmOuTQ=; b=kCCrcdFTYqrZUYuBN/pBMasKboKwHTZiQZUKz5OXDm1VT0q6deaATpqQrUBT3MOetNInd5 vN71hH58Klp8dYim2DqSqd0agTlZdrYbULxkGkz4/Duk25WycMr0l8PDAHhXr8zMTMAPg8 7EsXZDZD+noCrm5n1gGR8XP5Bggz8tA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1749818234; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ons9VlAWyS5iGbbTVkDBgSxgXbxKUV7OAg/2/YmOuTQ=; b=zQujh0/5m0F7qHNo6Y8TZIlFlZMoGQHLZqqAgCngNWCM5wyBLTzvSFxe87w9JxORxkjU0p nKm4FFKyJCrcwpAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1749818234; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ons9VlAWyS5iGbbTVkDBgSxgXbxKUV7OAg/2/YmOuTQ=; b=kCCrcdFTYqrZUYuBN/pBMasKboKwHTZiQZUKz5OXDm1VT0q6deaATpqQrUBT3MOetNInd5 vN71hH58Klp8dYim2DqSqd0agTlZdrYbULxkGkz4/Duk25WycMr0l8PDAHhXr8zMTMAPg8 7EsXZDZD+noCrm5n1gGR8XP5Bggz8tA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1749818234; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ons9VlAWyS5iGbbTVkDBgSxgXbxKUV7OAg/2/YmOuTQ=; b=zQujh0/5m0F7qHNo6Y8TZIlFlZMoGQHLZqqAgCngNWCM5wyBLTzvSFxe87w9JxORxkjU0p nKm4FFKyJCrcwpAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC6913782; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id oI1fGXobTGj9cgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:37:14 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:37:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87wm9frf5x.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Herve Codina , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] ALSA: pcm: Convert snd_pcm_sync_ptr() to user_access_begin/user_access_end() In-Reply-To: <2df61bbf-76f6-4932-a347-7820350a156e@csgroup.eu> References: <7baa34d4046c7750799b11830d38a46f8b581765.1749724478.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <79b86a0618328ba1d0cb5cf4011fd73ac6900e8f.1749724478.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <878qlwrnv1.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <2df61bbf-76f6-4932-a347-7820350a156e@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:03:04 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 13/06/2025 à 11:29, Takashi Iwai a écrit : > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:51:05 +0200, > > Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> > >> Now that snd_pcm_sync_ptr_get_user() and snd_pcm_sync_ptr_put_user() > >> are converted to user_access_begin/user_access_end(), > >> snd_pcm_sync_ptr_get_user() is more efficient than a raw get_user() > >> followed by a copy_from_user(). And because copy_{to/from}_user() are > >> generic functions focussed on transfer of big data blocks to/from user, > >> snd_pcm_sync_ptr_put_user() is also more efficient for small amont of > >> data. > >> > >> So use snd_pcm_sync_ptr_get_user() and snd_pcm_sync_ptr_put_user() in > >> snd_pcm_sync_ptr() too. > >> > >> In order to have snd_pcm_mmap_status32 similar to snd_pcm_mmap_status, > >> replace to tsamp_{sec/nsec} and audio_tstamp_{sec/nsec} by equivalent > >> struct __snd_timespec. > >> > >> snd_pcm_ioctl_sync_ptr_buggy() is left as it is because the conversion > >> wouldn't be straigh-forward do to the workaround it provides. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > > > > Through a quick glance, all patches look almost fine, but one favor to > > ask: this patch contains the convert from s32/s32 pair to struct > > __snd_timespec. It should be factored out to a prerequisite patch > > instead of burying in a big change. > > Shall I understand you prefer this series over the more simple "ALSA: > pcm: Convert snd_pcm_ioctl_sync_ptr_{compat/x32} to > user_access_begin/user_access_end()" patch ? Err, no, sorry for ambiguity. I wanted to move the replacement of tstamp_sec/nsec with struct __snd_timespec as a small preliminary patch from patch#3. That is, --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c @@ -3103,11 +3103,9 @@ struct snd_pcm_mmap_status32 { snd_pcm_state_t state; s32 pad1; u32 hw_ptr; - s32 tstamp_sec; - s32 tstamp_nsec; + struct __snd_timespec tstamp; snd_pcm_state_t suspended_state; - s32 audio_tstamp_sec; - s32 audio_tstamp_nsec; + struct __snd_timespec audio_tstamp; } __packed; etc. By factoring this out, it becomes clear that the timespec compatibility is fully cared. __snd_timespec may be defined in different ways on user-space, but in the kernel code, it's a single definition of s32/s32 pair. This needs to be emphasized. thanks, Takashi